Bias Suit Over Iconic Manhattan Address Includes Legal Boldface Names
Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente, a would-be politician whose aspirations to lead both the country and New York City were dashed this year, claims the Sherry-Netherland rejected his $1.275 million bid to buy an apartment due to bias.
December 05, 2017 at 04:02 PM
15 minute read
Manhattan's Sherry-Netherland, left, and Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente.
Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente, a failed third-party presidential candidate, FDIC-sanctioned former banker and successful car dealership owner of Mexican-American heritage, alleges in an amended complaint that the board members of a landmark Fifth Avenue building in Manhattan, the Sherry-Netherland, racially discriminated against him when they rejected his $1.275 million bid to buy an apartment.
In his Nov. 28 complaint, De La Fuente names as defendants the co-op's shareholders and nine co-op board members, including prominent lawyers Mary McInnis Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner (who is married to firm chairman David Boies) and former Jones Day partner Michael Horvitz, as well as Frederic M. Seegal, a high-profile investment banker.
Montieth Illingworth, a spokesman for the board and its members, denied the suit's claims and said their lawyer, Peter Shapiro of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith in New York, would “promptly” be filing a motion to dismiss. An initial complaint in the case was dismissed without prejudice.
“Having previously failed in court with similar claims, Mr. De La Fuente's final try is also without merit. No plausible claim is stated and there is not a single, well pleaded fact,” Illingworth said in a statement. “The complaint is also needlessly littered with inflammatory, scurrilous language that we believe is beneath the dignity of the court.”
De La Fuente's lawyer, Frederick Cains of New York, countered that the amended suit includes ”infinitely more fact than was the court's requirement.” The complaint, which includes eight separate counts, centers on alleged violations of the federal Fair Housing Act and New York anti-bias laws.
The complaint describes various luxuries provided to residents of the Sherry-Netherland, which also houses the restaurant Cipriani, including twice-daily maid service and elevator attendants wearing white linen gloves. It says the Upper East Side building's 154 cooperative apartments range in value from $500,000 for servant's quarters to over $65 million for full-floor layouts. But those apartments, De La Fuente alleges, are “exclusively owned by whites of western European ethnicities who discriminate against those of different races and national origins.”
De La Fuente claims his purchase bid was rejected because the current owners believe ”even the admission of one 'undesirable' would create a sense of 'there goes the neighborhood,' leading to tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars of losses of the collective market value of the 154 apartments.”
By rejecting his proposed purchase, De La Fuente alleges the Sherry-Netherland also undermined his planned bid to run for New York mayor in 2017.
In a Sept. 1 brief, the defendants described De La Fuente as a “disgraced former banker who has been adjudicated as unfit to oversee a bank.” In 2004, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. effectively banned De La Fuente from the banking industry, citing his “misconduct” and “purposeful dishonesty.”
The defendants also called him a “serial litigant who has filed dozens of actions in various federal and state courts.”
The new complaint, meanwhile, says De La Fuente “has never been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor and has never been fined by a government agency or court for any of his business dealings or personal conduct.” His lawyer said “no money was lost by anyone” at First International Bank in Chula Vista, California, before the FDIC removed him as the bank's director.
The complaint describes De La Fuente as “an anomalous buyer” because he submitted his bid to the Sherry-Netherland after the then-owner of the targeted apartment filed for Chapter 7. A bankruptcy judge initially determined De La Fuente's bid was the highest and best offer, the complaint states. He nevertheless provided the board with a “complete package including an accountant's financial statements, social reference letters, private club membership details, and several magazines in which his photo appeared on the cover of one,” the complaint states.
The board nevertheless rejected his bid without interviewing him, De La Fuente asserts.
Manhattan's Sherry-Netherland, left, and Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente.
Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente, a failed third-party presidential candidate, FDIC-sanctioned former banker and successful car dealership owner of Mexican-American heritage, alleges in an amended complaint that the board members of a landmark Fifth Avenue building in Manhattan, the Sherry-Netherland, racially discriminated against him when they rejected his $1.275 million bid to buy an apartment.
In his Nov. 28 complaint, De La Fuente names as defendants the co-op's shareholders and nine co-op board members, including prominent lawyers Mary McInnis Boies of
Montieth Illingworth, a spokesman for the board and its members, denied the suit's claims and said their lawyer, Peter Shapiro of
“Having previously failed in court with similar claims, Mr. De La Fuente's final try is also without merit. No plausible claim is stated and there is not a single, well pleaded fact,” Illingworth said in a statement. “The complaint is also needlessly littered with inflammatory, scurrilous language that we believe is beneath the dignity of the court.”
De La Fuente's lawyer, Frederick Cains of
The complaint describes various luxuries provided to residents of the Sherry-Netherland, which also houses the restaurant Cipriani, including twice-daily maid service and elevator attendants wearing white linen gloves. It says the Upper East Side building's 154 cooperative apartments range in value from $500,000 for servant's quarters to over $65 million for full-floor layouts. But those apartments, De La Fuente alleges, are “exclusively owned by whites of western European ethnicities who discriminate against those of different races and national origins.”
De La Fuente claims his purchase bid was rejected because the current owners believe ”even the admission of one 'undesirable' would create a sense of 'there goes the neighborhood,' leading to tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars of losses of the collective market value of the 154 apartments.”
By rejecting his proposed purchase, De La Fuente alleges the Sherry-Netherland also undermined his planned bid to run for
In a Sept. 1 brief, the defendants described De La Fuente as a “disgraced former banker who has been adjudicated as unfit to oversee a bank.” In 2004, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. effectively banned De La Fuente from the banking industry, citing his “misconduct” and “purposeful dishonesty.”
The defendants also called him a “serial litigant who has filed dozens of actions in various federal and state courts.”
The new complaint, meanwhile, says De La Fuente “has never been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor and has never been fined by a government agency or court for any of his business dealings or personal conduct.” His lawyer said “no money was lost by anyone” at First International Bank in Chula Vista, California, before the FDIC removed him as the bank's director.
The complaint describes De La Fuente as “an anomalous buyer” because he submitted his bid to the Sherry-Netherland after the then-owner of the targeted apartment filed for Chapter 7. A bankruptcy judge initially determined De La Fuente's bid was the highest and best offer, the complaint states. He nevertheless provided the board with a “complete package including an accountant's financial statements, social reference letters, private club membership details, and several magazines in which his photo appeared on the cover of one,” the complaint states.
The board nevertheless rejected his bid without interviewing him, De La Fuente asserts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Perkins Coie Partner Moves to Stradley Ronon in Chicago
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250