Proskauer's Revenue Crosses $1B Amid Growing Puerto Rico Workload
More firm lawyers than ever worked on Puerto Rico's reorganization, while Proskauer's London office revenue increased by 18.5%.
March 10, 2020 at 06:02 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Proskauer Rose grew its revenue by 2.8%, past the $1 billion mark for the first time and upped its profits per equity partner by 3.4% to $2.75 million in 2019, helped along by increased leverage, a strong London office and a busy year in Puerto Rico's restructuring case.
Firm chairman Steven Ellis said Proskauer had "a good year across the board" in 2019 and that productivity was high. He said the firm focused on key industries, including sports, health care, asset management, hospitality, gaming and leisure, and more lawyers than ever—about 35% of the firm—worked on Puerto Rico's bankruptcy-esque proceeding, where it represents the island's Financial Oversight and Management Board.
The firm's London office delivered higher-than-average growth, increasing its revenue by 18.5% in 2019, from $68.7 million in 2018 to $81.4 million. Ellis said the firm "significantly expanded" its private investment funds practice there, and its private equity and mergers and acquisitions lawyers stayed busy as the growth in private credit business also led to more work. He said he anticipates the office will grow further in disputes in 2020.
"There were no aberrations," he said of the New York firm's 2019 finances. "It's just been solid."
As total head count rose by 2.5% to 744 lawyers, revenue per lawyer was mostly flat at $1.351 million.
Proskauer's compensation of all nonequity partners rose sharply, from about $57.7 million to $66.8 million, up about 15.8%, even as the firm's average number of nonequity partners was roughly flat at 68. Ellis said there was no change to the firm's "methodology or calculus" and chalked up the increase to the market for talented lawyers. Meanwhile, the firm's equity partnership tier contracted to 169 partners, a net loss of four lawyers, increasing the firm's leverage.
Ellis highlighted several high-profile matters last year, including its representation of Johnson & Johnson, which has worked with Proskauer's Bart Williams and others to fight a raft of lawsuits that claim its baby powder causes cancer, and Amgen, the biopharmaceutical company, in patent litigation with Genentech. He also noted the firm's work for Creative Artists Agency in its dispute with United Talent Agency.
For restructuring and related practices, the increasing Puerto Rico work has been something of a mixed bag. Ellis said he's proud of the work the firm has done on the case, which aims to get the territory's economy and finances back on track. But it has also been done at a "substantial discount" compared with the firm's other matters, in the words of the firm's engagement letter.
The firm's 150 private funds lawyers are "probably one of the largest and busiest teams in the market," Ellis said, closing 150 funds with $68 billion in committed capital last year and working on nearly as many secondary transactions.
Other corporate lawyers at the firm tapped the firm's "deep sector knowledge" of the sports and gaming industries in big deals such as The Stars Group's sports gambling partnership with Fox Sports, Ellis said.
While Ellis said there was no "major falloff" in any business, Law.com reported in March 2019 that about 20 lawyers from Proskauer's Los Angeles office left for Kirkland & Ellis last year. The group move was led by corporate and securities partner Michael Woronoff. Ellis said the group was "really centered around one client," declining to specify the client.
Overall last year, the firm tallied a total of 19 lateral partner departures, 13 lateral partner additions, plus retirements and promotions.
As far as 2020 is concerned, Ellis says the firm is ready for whatever shifts the business cycle may have in store, adding that the firm was "well-positioned" to advise clients on the challenges posed by the new coronavirus outbreak. He said he thought that Proskauer would see "substantial growth and success" in Boston, where the firm currently lists more than 120 lawyers.
The 2019 financial figures reported in this report are preliminary. ALM will report finalized data for the Am Law 200 in The American Lawyer's May and June issues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250