Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates
P.C.
75 Ponce De Leon Ave NE Ste 101
Atlanta,
GA 30308(470) 294-1674
www.garymartinhays.com
By Max Mitchell | January 10, 2020
Though the 11-page order did not outline exactly how much should be allocated to each firm, the motion requesting attorney fees allocated the lion's share to New York-based Garwin Gerstein & Fisher.
By Charles Toutant | December 27, 2019
New Jersey was at the forefront of a legal and public policy battle over mandatory arbitration of employment and consumer contracts in 2019. And 2020 promises more conflict as pro-arbitration interests and those opposing mandatory arbitration battle in state and federal courts.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Elai Katz | December 23, 2019
In his Antitrust column, Elai Katz discusses a recent Second Circuit case that serves as yet another reminder of the crucial role rigorous relevant market analysis plays in antitrust litigation.
By Cheryl Miller | December 20, 2019
Sutter Health admitted no wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement.
By Tom McParland | December 17, 2019
The proposed settlement must still be approved by U.S. District Judge Jed. S. Rakoff, who has been overseeing the case in Manhattan.
National Law Journal | Commentary
By Ben Steinberg and Adam Mendel | December 17, 2019
The Justice Department's investigation into a fuel-efficiency agreement between automakers could chill environmental collaboration for years to come.
By Scott Graham | December 13, 2019
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh says a global dispute over patents that are essential to automotive connectivity belongs in the Northern District of Texas.
By Scott Graham | December 12, 2019
The San Jose federal judge says a global dispute over patents that are essential to automotive connectivity belongs in the Northern District of Texas.
By Scott Graham | December 12, 2019
The San Jose federal judge says a global dispute over patents that are essential to automotive connectivity belongs in the Northern District of Texas.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert | December 11, 2019
In recent years, practitioners have observed a tension between criminal enforcement of the broadly written terms of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the modern Supreme Court's notions of statutory interpretation and due process in the criminal law context. A certiorari petition filed in late August asks the Supreme Court to address this tension, as embodied in the judge-made per se rule. White-Collar Crime columnists Robert J. Anello and Richard F. Albert discuss the issues and the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a litigation services boutique, is seeking to add a senior litigation associate to support their rapidly growing practice. A Big...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
