November 06, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: 'Nuclear Verdicts'—Opportunistic Alarmism Disguised as AdvocacyWhat qualifies as a "nuclear" or "shock" verdict is apparently defined as jury awards as low as $10 million, the implication being that any verdict exceeding seven figures surpasses what they would have one believe is a "reasonable" or "rational" plaintiff's verdict, writes contributor Adam J. Levitt.
By Adam J. Levitt
7 minute read
October 02, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: Arbitration and Class Action Waivers—The Hypocrisy of the 'Textualists'Arguing Class Actions is a monthly column for the National Law Journal written by DiCello Levitt's Adam J. Levitt.
By Adam J. Levitt
9 minute read
September 11, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: The Burden of Proof for Class CertificationArguing Class Actions is a monthly column for the National Law Journal written by DiCello Levitt's Adam J. Levitt.
By Adam J. Levitt
7 minute read
August 07, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: In Defense of Statutory Damages"Adopting more laws nationwide that provide for statutory damages can refine the issues, eliminate a large portion of cost-prohibitive expert discovery, and provide for a mechanism that decides merits-based issues in a far more cost-effective way," says DiCello Levitt founding partner Adam J. Levitt.
By Adam J. Levitt
7 minute read
July 10, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: Cryptocurrency Class Litigation: Surviving Jurisdictional ChallengesEstablishing personal jurisdiction over defendants in cryptocurrency class actions in the U.S. requires an embrace of innovative solutions that account for the unique characteristics of this digital landscape.
By Adam J. Levitt
7 minute read
June 05, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: Manifestation and Its DiscontentsProduct defect class actions, latent defects, and Article III standing.
By Adam J. Levitt
8 minute read
May 01, 2023 | National Law Journal
Arguing Class Actions: The Value of a Trial-First Approach in Post-Pandemic Class ActionsArguing Class Actions is a monthly column for the National Law Journal.
By Adam J. Levitt
7 minute read
May 21, 2008 | Law.com
E-Discovery Is All in the AskingThe most recent federal decision weighing in on the hot-button issue of discovery of metadata and documents in their "native format," i.e., "the way it is stored and used in the normal course of business," offers some simple, common-sense advice on how to best achieve that discovery objective: Ask for it. Up front. Otherwise, if you ask too late or have already received the documents in another format, you may be out of luck.
By Adam J. Levitt and Scott J. Farrell
11 minute read
May 16, 2008 | New York Law Journal
Taming the Metadata BeastAdam J. Levitt, a partner in the Chicago office of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, and Scott J. Farrell, an associate in the firm's New York office, write that the most recent federal decision weighing in on the hot-button issue of discovery of metadata and documents in their "native format," i.e., "the way it is stored and used in the normal course of business," offers some simple, common-sense advice on how to best achieve that discovery objective: Ask for it. Up front.
By Adam J. Levitt and Scott J. Farrell
11 minute read
May 21, 2008 | Legaltech News
E-Discovery Is All in the AskingIn e-discovery, communicating in a clear and precise manner about what you want, and why you want it, can go a long way. Wolf Haldenstein's Adam J. Levitt and Scott J. Farrell note that a recent federal decision offers some simple, commonsense advice on how to best achieve e-discovery objectives.
By Adam J. Levitt and Scott J. Farrell
11 minute read
Trending Stories