November 02, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Two Cases Challenge Constitutionality of COVID-19 MandatesIn this edition of their Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw and Jenna C. Smith address two recent—and somewhat conflicting— decisions on requests for emergency relief from New York state's respective mask and vaccine mandates.
By Adam R. Shaw and Jenna C. Smith
6 minute read
August 06, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Water Contamination Settlement and Student Loan Class CertificationIn their Northern District Roundup, Adam Shaw and Jenna Smith address two recent class action decisions: The first granting preliminary approval of a settlement with defendants accused of contaminating groundwater in Hoosick Falls, New York; and the second granting a motion for class certification of student loan borrowers alleging their rights to prepay their student loans had been violated.
By Adam R. Shaw and Jenna C. Smith
6 minute read
November 01, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Court Revisits Personal Jurisdiction Issues Post-'Daimler'In his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw discusses recent decisions that revisited personal jurisdiction issues since the U.S. Supreme Court's 'Daimler AG v. Bauman' changed the landscape.
By Adam R. Shaw
11 minute read
August 30, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Court Decides Finality of Settlement and Service of Process IssueIn his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw discusses a case evaluating when a settlement is final for enforcement, and a decision exploring how service of process affects the timeliness of removal of a case to federal court.
By Adam R. Shaw
13 minute read
March 01, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Recent Decisions Address Jurisdiction in Probate Cases and Due Process RightsIn his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw reports on decisions on "one of the most mysterious and esoteric branches of the law of federal jurisdiction" and the extent that due process rights protect personal reputations.
By Adam R. Shaw
15 minute read
November 18, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Settlement Agreement Not Binding; Dismissal After Violating Local RulesNorthern District Roundup columnist Adam R. Shaw examines two rulings, one on whether an agreed to, but unsigned, settlement agreement was binding, and another that offers a reminder that failing to follow the Local Rules can be fatal to your claim. The cases are "H&R Block Tax Services v. Strauss," and "Stubby Strips v. Food Market Merchandising."
By Adam R. Shaw
16 minute read
July 15, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Anonymity in Lawsuit Maintained; Removal to Federal Court DeniedIn his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw discusses noteworthy decisions, including one addressing when it is proper to maintain a lawsuit anonymously and another remanding contempt proceedings to state court.
By Adam R. Shaw
15 minute read
March 30, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Recovering Against LLC, Injunction, Declaratory JudgmentIn his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw of Boies, Schiller & Flexner profiles three decisions: one addressing when creditors can gain control over interests in a LLC, another explaining the duration of permanent injunctions, and the last discussing ripeness in declaratory judgment actions.
By Adam R. Shaw
21 minute read
December 10, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Venue, Jurisdiction and Whether to Stay Action Pending MDLIn his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw discusses three recent decisions in which Judge David Hurd considered the factors for a transfer of venue in ruling to keep a case in the Northern District; Judge Mae D'Agostino evaluated the criteria for abstention in deciding to walk away; and Magistrate Judge Christian Hummel analyzed whether to stay an action in favor of a pending multi-district litigation proceeding and decided to keep the case running.
By Adam R. Shaw
11 minute read
December 09, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Venue, Jurisdiction and Whether to Stay Action Pending MDLIn his Northern District Roundup, Adam R. Shaw discusses three recent decisions in which Judge David Hurd considered the factors for a transfer of venue in ruling to keep a case in the Northern District; Judge Mae D'Agostino evaluated the criteria for abstention in deciding to walk away; and Magistrate Judge Christian Hummel analyzed whether to stay an action in favor of a pending multi-district litigation proceeding and decided to keep the case running.
By Adam R. Shaw
11 minute read
Trending Stories