NEXT

Alan L Zegas

Alan L Zegas

April 26, 2000 | Law.com

May It Please the Court

I recently had a law student named Ben intern in my office to see what it was like to be in private practice. Ben was there when I got the call from the Circuit clerk's office. We heard over the speakerphone: "I was just calling to tell you that the court cannot accept the brief you filed last week." "Oh, why's that?," I asked. The reply: "You used the correct 12-point type throughout your brief, but one footnote is set in 10-point type."

By Alan L. Zegas

8 minute read

August 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

Court Weighs In on Racially-Targeted Law Enforcement

As a result of racial profiling at long last being recognized as a serious problem on this state's highways, cases have begun filtering up to the Court dealing with racially targeted law enforcement and a corollary, the consent search.

By Alan L. Zegas

32 minute read

April 05, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

Hail to Our Newest Crime

A look at the use of the criminal process to handle those who conduct same-sex marriages.

By Alan L. Zegas

5 minute read

September 06, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

Court Paves the Way for Recorded Confessions

The Court's opinions this past term reflect a high level of agreement among the justices, confirming that this state's High Court, unlike the United States Supreme Court, does not have deep ideological divides. Of the 33 criminal cases decided, 22 opinions were unanimous.

By Alan L. Zegas

49 minute read

September 02, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

Court Expresses Displeasure for Plea Agreements Based on Faulty Advice and for The Polygraph

There was no single area of focus for the Court, but several cases this term dealt with defendants seeking to retract plea agreements based upon the alleged faulty advice of counsel. In one instance, a defendant claimed to have turned down a plea agreement because he received faulty sentencing advice from counsel.

By Alan L. Zegas

50 minute read

September 01, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

Drawing Bright Lines for the Role of the Jury

In the 2002-2003 term, the Supreme Court decided a wide span of issues, including juror disqualification; searches and seizures; DNA procurement applications; conflicts of interest on the part of both prosecutors and defense attorneys; child endangering; the admission of personality disorder evidence, of excited utterances and of prior wrongs; child pornography; self representation; the wearing of prison garb and restraints by testifying witnesses; jury instructions; sentencing; and others.

By Alan L. Zegas

67 minute read

September 02, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

The Ripple Effect on Testimonial Statements

The Supreme Court's criminal docket this past term was one of the heaviest in recent memory with a special focus on testimonial statements, jury instructions, and search-and-seizure-related issues.

By Alan L. Zegas

66 minute read

August 31, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

Court Rings in New Standards for Eyewitness Identification and Sounds the Death Knell for Res Gestae

WA trial court has no authority to deny defendants their constitutional right of confrontation merely because the court believes that cross-examination will be of little use.

By Alan L. Zegas

51 minute read

August 31, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

State Wins Three Fifth Amendment Battles

The Supreme Court's 2006-2007 term produced a wealth of criminal cases in a variety of areas, including three important cases involving the Fifth Amendment.

By Alan L. Zegas

46 minute read

August 31, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Justice Wallace Leaves His Mark: School Searches Subjected to a Standard Lower Than Probable Cause

Though the Governor's decision to not reappoint Wallace was enmeshed in controversy, the decisions of Justice Wallace, this term as in prior ones, hardly reflect a jurist run amok. In one of the Court's milestone decisions this past term, he decided that a high school assistant principal's decision to search a student's automobile parked on school property was subject to a lower standard than probable cause.

By Alan L. Zegas

107 minute read


More from ALM