Brad S. Karp

April 16, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Brad S. Karp, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rikind, Wharton & Garrison, and Christopher Hyde Giampapa, an associate at the firm, write that analyze a question recently heard by the Supreme Court: What must a plaintiff allege to state a claim for securities fraud under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?

By Brad S. Karp and Christopher Hyde Giampapa

15 minute read

May 30, 2003 | New York Law Journal

By Martin Flumenbaum And Brad S. Karp

13 minute read

June 23, 2010 | New York Law Journal

In their Second Circuit Review column, Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, write that recent ruling provides important guidance both for lawyers who draft public filings and those litigating the applicability of the safe harbor to allegedly misleading forward-looking statements.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S.Karp

11 minute read

June 27, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, write that although the Second Circuit recognized that its decision in Triumph Capital was "intensely context-specific," and the courts in this circuit are unlikely to derive much in the way of bright line guidance from it, it made clear that even modest restrictions on attorney client communications could rise could rise to the level of a constitutional violation.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

12 minute read

April 26, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, members of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, report on United States v. Quattrone, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed a variety of criminal law and evidentiary issues in the course of reversing the conviction of Frank Quattrone for obstruction of justice and witness tampering and ordering a new trial.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

12 minute read

April 30, 1999 | Law.com

Two significant securities law cases were recently decided by the Second Circuit. In Stevelman v. Alias Research Inc., the court reversed dismissal of a complaint, finding sufficient allegations of "motive and opportunity" to support a strong inference of fraudulent intent. In Crane Co. v. Coltec Industries Inc., the court held that a confidentiality agreement did not obligate parties to merger negotiations to notify each other of welcome advances by a third party.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

18 minute read

December 29, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss Staehr v. The Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., where the defendants relied on lawsuits filed in state courts, news reports in mainstream media and industry publications, and portions of filings with the SEC to support its argument that plaintiffs were on inquiry notice of the contingent commission arrangements at issue more than two years prior to the filing of the complaint and that the statute of limitations had run.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

12 minute read

April 25, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, members of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss the recent decision in ITC Limited v. Punchgini, Inc., which created a circuit split with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding the applicability of the "famous marks" exception to the territorial scope of trademark protection under federal law.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

13 minute read

April 23, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss a decision written by Judge John Walker Jr. and joined by Judges Ralph Winter and Rosemary Pooler, reversed the District Court's certification of a class action by smokers alleging they were deceived by the defendant tobacco companies' marketing of so-called light cigarettes as a healthier alternative to regular, or "full-flavored," cigarettes.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

12 minute read

May 25, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, write that campaign finance law is in a state of flux. Two weeks ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued the last of a series of opinions, over several vociferous dissents, explaining its decision not to hear in banc Landell v. Sorell.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

15 minute read