Catherine Nyarady is a partner in the Litigation Department and Chair of the Patent Litigation Group, specializing in technology related matters, including patent litigation and digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI). She is registered to practice in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Catherine has led many significant, high-profile litigation matters and regularly counsels industry-leading clients on their most complex issues.
November 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Supreme Court Asked to Review Issues of Secondary Liability for Copyright InfringementThis article disucsses issues of secondary liability for copyright infringement by the U.S. Supreme Court.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
8 minute read
July 09, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Federal Circuit To Decide Constitutionality of 'Bad Faith' Patent Litigation StatutesOn May 3, 2023, Judge David C. Nye of the District of Idaho imposed the first-ever bond order under Idaho's Bad Faith Assertions of Patent Infringement Act. In that order, the court required patent owner Katana or its parent company, Longhorn, to post an $8 million bond before allowing it to proceed with its patent infringement suit against Micron.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
9 minute read
May 07, 2024 | New York Law Journal
Fourth Circuit Upholds Denial of Trademark Registration for Timberland Boot DesignOn April 15, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court decision denying trademark registration to TBL Licensing LLC for its Timberland boots.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
9 minute read
March 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal
The Battle Over Design Patent Obviousness: Will The 'Rosen-Durling' Test Continue To Govern Future Design Patent Obviousness Inquiries?An en banc panel of the Federal Circuit will soon decide whether to amend its long-standing framework for assessing design patent obviousness, known as the 'Rosen-Durling' test. The forthcoming decision in 'LKQ v. GM Global Technology Operations' will be the first en banc decision the Federal Circuit has issued in a design patent case since 2008.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
8 minute read
January 09, 2024 | New York Law Journal
The 'Wavy Baby' Case and Consideration of Expressive Works in the Second CircuitThe Second Circuit recently determined that no special First Amendment protections applied to a defendant's use of the Vans Old Skool shoe trademark in selling its own shoes purportedly intended as a critique of sneaker culture. It affirmed the district court's entry of a preliminary injunction against the defendant, finding the plaintiff was likely to succeed on its trademark infringement claim under the Lanham Act. In doing so, it issued its first opinion applying the Supreme Court's June 2023 decision in 'Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products'.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
8 minute read
November 07, 2023 | New York Law Journal
AI-Generated Artwork and Copyright OwnershipThe U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in line with the U.S. Copyright Office's determination, found that the generative AI-created artwork at issue in 'Thaler v. Perlmutter' did not satisfy the Copyright Act's "human authorship" requirements.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
7 minute read
September 12, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Lanham Act's Registration Requirements Head to the Supreme Court in Another First Amendment ChallengeIn this article, Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker discuss the pending 'Vidal v. Elster' Supreme Court case and whether a provision of the Lanham Act violates the First Amendment by barring registration of a trademark that contains criticism of a government official or public figure.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
8 minute read
July 11, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Distinguishing Unexpected Results From Unexpected Mechanisms of Action in Evaluating Non-ObviousnessMany inventions build on or combine previously known elements, requiring the Patent Office and courts to determine which combinations of, or improvement on, previously known elements are entitled to protection. In doing so, whether or not the claimed invention is patentable often involves asking whether the invention provides unexpected results.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
6 minute read
March 20, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Trademark Infringement Liability for NFT SalesA jury awarded Hermès $133,000 in damages after finding that defendant Mason Rothschild's "MetaBirkins" project—a collection of 100 digital image NFTs of Hermès handbags covered in colorful fur—infringed and diluted the mark to Hermès's Birkin handbags, and that Rothschild was liable for cybersquatting with respect to his "MetaBirkins" website.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
6 minute read
January 10, 2023 | New York Law Journal
Supreme Court To Address Extraterritorial Scope of the Lanham ActIn 2023, the Supreme Court is set to address the extraterritorial application of the protections provided by the Lanham Act.
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker
8 minute read
Trending Stories