Committee On Judicial Ethic

March 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal

A judge may accept a trade union's offer of a social dinner and overnight accommodations at the union's annual convention for the judge and their spouse, where the union and its members have not come, and are not likely to come, before the judge.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

3 minute read

March 11, 2024 | New York Law Journal

A judicial association may not consent to have its name listed as a client on a consultant's website.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

4 minute read

March 10, 2024 | New York Law Journal

May a full-time judge donate $100 to sponsor an award at a local Independence Day parade organized by a not-for-profit civic entity, where the judge's connection will be announced at the end of the parade and the parade is a non-political, non-fund raising event?

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

2 minute read

March 07, 2024 | New York Law Journal

A judge need not insulate their law clerk from a custody proceeding merely because their law clerk's third-degree relative has a child in common with one of the parties, where the law clerk has no familial connection to any of the parties, witnesses, or subject child in the present proceeding. If the judge chooses to make a disclosure, the judge retains full discretion to preside and permit the law clerk to participate in the matter, whether or not the parties object.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

5 minute read

March 06, 2024 | New York Law Journal

An elected judge may make a charitable donation by check payable to a not-for-profit charitable organization in memory of the deceased relative of a district leader of a local political party, but may not send the contribution to the district leader for collection.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

3 minute read

March 05, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Provided the judge concludes he/she can be fair and impartial, the judge need not disqualify from a case merely because (a) the complainant is a long-time professional acquaintance of the judge and (b) the defendant has attempted to contact the judge ex parte, accused the judge of corruption and bigotry, threatened the judge's career, and implicitly threatened the judge's family. However, the judge should disclose on the record the substance of any threats of violence by the defendant that were received ex parte.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

7 minute read

March 04, 2024 | New York Law Journal

May a judge serve as the secretary-treasurer of a not-for-profit organization which owns and operates a cemetery for the descendants of Jewish immigrants? The position oversees investments, maintains a checking account, sends out meeting notices with the annual dues notice, and deposits all funds received. The organization does no fund-raising.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

2 minute read

March 03, 2024 | New York Law Journal

(1) Where the judge's former law student intern has been hired by a local law firm as a summer associate, and that firm is now appearing before the judge on a case the former intern worked on during the internship, but has notified all parties that the former intern will be insulated from the case, the judge may preside in the case after making full disclosure of the relationship to all parties on the record. (2) The judge is not prohibited from speaking to the former intern on non-work matters during the pendency of the case.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

5 minute read

February 29, 2024 | New York Law Journal

A support magistrate who previously served as the supervising attorney at the Department of Social Services may handle child support cases filed after the magistrate's departure from the agency, provided there is no substantial connection between the circumstances underlying the prior proceeding and the facts and legal issues presently before the magistrate. If such connection exists, disclosure or disqualification is required.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

6 minute read

February 28, 2024 | New York Law Journal

On these facts, the judge is not required to disqualify from a contentious criminal case, notwithstanding the defense counsel's claims of bias, provided the judge determines they can be fair and impartial.

By Committee on Judicial Ethics

7 minute read