February 26, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Policy Count Continues to Drop at Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation has completed a twelfth round of depopulation, according to the state’s insurance commissioner, Jim Donelon.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
2 minute read
February 25, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
California Medical Office Employees Charged with $540,000 Insurance FraudThree employees of a medical office in Inland Empire, California, have been arrested for allegedly filing over $4 million in false insurance claims for treatments they claimed they received from their employer.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
2 minute read
February 25, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
1st Circuit, in Decision by Justice Souter, Rejects Claim for Uninsured Motorist BenefitsThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in a decision written by retired Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, sitting by designation, has rejected an employee’s claim for uninsured motorist benefits under his employer’s umbrella insurance policy.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
4 minute read
February 25, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
1st Circuit, Finding ‘Decay’ Ambiguous, Affirms Insurance Coverage for Church’s Ceiling CollapseThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, holding that the term “decay” in an insurance policy issued to a church was ambiguous, has ruled that the church was entitled to coverage for damage caused when a ceiling in the church partially collapsed.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
5 minute read
February 25, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Corporate Insurance Policies Did Not Cover Employee Sued After Driving Executive’s VehicleA federal district court in Georgia has ruled that an employee who allegedly was involved in an accident while driving a vehicle personally owned by an executive officer of her employer – and the officer himself – were not entitled to a defense or indemnification from the company’s insurer for a lawsuit stemming from the accident.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
4 minute read
February 25, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Late Notice Doomed Bar’s Bid for Insurance Coverage, 4th Circuit RulesThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, affirming a district court’s decision, has ruled that an insurance company did not have to indemnify a bar for damages resulting from a bar fight where the bar failed to comply with the notice provisions of its insurance policies.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
6 minute read
February 21, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Appellate Court Rejects Auto Body Shop’s Suit Against Insurer Over “Prevailing Market Labor Rates”An appellate court in Texas has affirmed a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to an insurer in a case brought by an auto body shop over “prevailing market labor rates.”
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
4 minute read
February 21, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Appraisal Doomed Insured’s Suit Against Insurer, Texas Court DecidesA federal district court in Texas, citing appraisal of the insured’s claim and the insurer’s payment of the amount awarded by the appraisers, has granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer in the insured’s lawsuit.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
4 minute read
February 21, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Court Denies Insurer’s Bid to Recover Fees and Costs It Incurred in Defending Under Reservation of RightsA federal district court in Florida has ruled that a mold/fungal exclusion relieved an insurer of its duty to defend its insureds in a lawsuit – but the court nevertheless denied the insurer’s motion to recover fees and costs it incurred in defending its insureds under a reservation of rights.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
4 minute read
February 21, 2019 | FC&S Insurance
Insurance Policy’s Exclusion Must Be Read in “Context” to See If It’s Understandable, Georgia Appeals Court RulesA Georgia appellate court has reversed a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment against an insured after the trial court decided that an exclusion in an insurance policy was “plain and unambiguous.” The appellate court ruled that the exclusion had to be read in “context” before it could be determined whether it was plain and unambiguous.
By FC&S Legal Director Esq. Steven A. Meyerowitz
6 minute read