NEXT

Hart

Hart

April 07, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Attorney Privilege in Medical Malpractice Cases: How Far Can It Reach?

Throughout the course of medical malpractice cases, depositions are a key component of the process of discovery. In these cases, it is common practice for defense counsel to seek the depositions of family members of named plaintiffs.

By Sarah Hart Charette

6 minute read

June 12, 2017 | Legaltech News

The Layered Federal and State Cybersecurity Regulation of Financial Services Firms

Cybercrime poses an ever-increasing threat to consumers of financial products and services, and now individual states are increasingly joining federal agencies in the regulatory game.

By Brian Neil Hoffman, Romaine Marshall and Matt Sorensen, Holland & Hart, Cybersecurity Law & Strategy

10 minute read

April 26, 2016 | Daily Business Review

Why Many Manager Removal Provisions Are Doomed to Fail

Planning for the possibility of a falling out among business partners can reduce litigation and costs later, write attorneys Matthew R. Chait and Jonathan P. Hart.

By Commentary by Matthew R. Chait and Jonathan P. Hart

8 minute read

January 04, 2016 | Daily Business Review

Social Media Require Right Strategies, or They Waste Time Writes Jacques Hart

While attorneys are beginning to see the dollar signs associated with social media marketing, many are wasting valuable time and resources by jumping into the deep end without establishing effective strategies for achieving their goals, according to Jacques Hart

By Commentary by Jacques Hart

4 minute read

January 04, 2016 | Daily Business Review

Social Media Require Right Strategies, or They Waste Time Writes Jacques Hart

While attorneys are beginning to see the dollar signs associated with social media marketing, many are wasting valuable time and resources by jumping into the deep end without establishing effective strategies for achieving their goals, according to Jacques Hart

By Commentary by Jacques Hart

4 minute read

January 26, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Conduct Within the Scope Cannot Be Beyond the Reach

Barbara Hart, Chair of the Antitrust Law Section, discusses the issue of whether the Federal Trade Antitrust Improvements Act speaks to a federal court's power to hear the case (subject matter jurisdiction) or to the substantive elements of a Sherman Act claim.

By Barbara Hart

4 minute read

January 22, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Conduct Within the Scope Cannot Be Beyond the Reach

Barbara Hart, Chair of the Antitrust Law Section, discusses the issue of whether the Federal Trade Antitrust Improvements Act speaks to a federal court's power to hear the case (subject matter jurisdiction) or to the substantive elements of a Sherman Act claim.

By Barbara Hart

4 minute read

September 25, 2014 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Employee Benefits Liability Insurance Coverage for Affordable Care Act Liabilities

This article considers the prospects for Employee Benefits Liability coverage for alleged failures to provide promised health insurance and for the “assessable…

By Eryn Correa Michael Hart James E. Scheuermann

32 minute read

March 19, 2014 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Chancery Rejects Attempt to Stop Running of Interest in Appraisal Action

On Feb. 12, Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a ruling preventing an appraisal defendant from "prepaying" a portion of the merger consideration to an appraisal petitioner in order to lessen the interest payment due on the ultimate award. The decision, Huff Fund Investment Partnership v. CKx, Civil Action No. 6844-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 12, 2014), protects a key leverage point for stockholders exercising their statutory appraisal rights, including those engaged in so-called appraisal "arbitrage"—the right to receive significant interest on top of an appraisal award.

By Brian M. Lutz and Nancy E. Hart

5 minute read

November 21, 2002 | Law.com

Is a 'Work for Hire' Characterization Always Subject to Challenge?

Copyright lawyers have long known the value of characterizing a creator-acquirer relationship as one "for hire." The 2nd Circuit's decision in Marvel Characters Inc. v. Simonindicates that a settlement agreement containing a work for hire clause may be subject to later challenge -- raising the stakes for both sides in negotiating agreements that involve "termination-free" acquisitions of copyrights.

By Jon A. Baumgarten and William M. Hart

8 minute read