Harvey M Stone

December 12, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, analyze rulings by Judge John Gleeson, who upheld a complaint by an inmate against prison personnel for their alleged fault in not protecting him from an attack, and Judge Joanna Seybert, who ruled that plaintiff was not entitled to have a federal three-judge panel review his exclusion from an election to the state Senate, and other recent decisions.

By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan

13 minute read

March 11, 2011 | New York Law Journal

In this month's Eastern District Roundup installment, Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan of Schlam Stone & Dolan discuss recent decisions, including Judge Joseph F. Bianco's approval of the government's motion to prosecute a juvenile defendant in district court as an adult, and Judge Sterling Johnson Jr.'s refusal to dismiss certain defamation claims against former Yankee pitcher Roger Clemens.

By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan

10 minute read

March 11, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Peter R. Schlam and Harvey M. Stone, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, report on several significant, representative decisions handed down recently in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

By Peter R. Schlam And Harvey M. Stone

9 minute read

September 09, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, report on several significant decisions handed down recently in the Eastern District, including a ruling furthering the rather intricate evolution of law relating to police interrogation of suspects in successive warned and unwarned phases.

By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan

8 minute read

August 14, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, review recent decisions of interest, including an acquittal on money laundering charges, a finding of a Title VII violation in the hiring procedures of the New York City Fire Department, a rejection of a defendant's constitutional challenge to a sentence imposing a fine greater than the collateral forfeiture amount in lieu of an appearance, an ordering of disgorgement from Relief Defendants who, though not directly accused of wrongdoing, had received ill-gotten funds from defendants without consideration, and more.

By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan

14 minute read

October 08, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Peter R. Schlam and Harvey M. Stone, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, report on several significant, representative decisions handed down recently in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

By Peter R. Schlam and Harvey M. Stone

11 minute read

January 14, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Peter R. Schlam and Harvey M. Stone, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, report on recent rulings concerning CERCLA, an out-of-possession owner with respect to an accident inside an apartment building, the discharge of a resident discharge from Father Flanagan's Boys' Home, and the aftermath of successful claims of retaliation and hostile work environment.

By Peter R. Schlam and Harvey M. Stone

11 minute read

January 10, 2002 | New York Law Journal

T his column reports on several significant, representative decisions handed down recently in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. On Attorney Disqualification, Rule 37(c)(1), Internal Investigations.

By Peter R. Schlam And Harvey M. Stone

12 minute read

July 13, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, review recent Eastern District decisions that invalidated an enhanced sentence imposed under New York's discretionary persistent felony offender statute, upheld a parolee's �1983 complaint alleging retaliation by his parole officer and found that, in light of their prior criminal convictions, defendants in a civil case were collaterally estopped from pursuing their third-party claims.

By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan

9 minute read

May 08, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan, partners at Schlam Stone & Dolan, review recent decisions in which Judge Jack B. Weinstein rejected the government's application to impose certain restrictive conditions on defendant during service of his sentence; Judge Joseph F. Bianco dismissed an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act, but without prejudice to reindictment; Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis denied British Airways' motion to dismiss a putative class action against it for reckless baggage handling; and Judge Dora L. Irizarry dealt with claims of quantum meruit and unfair competition in denying defendant's summary judgment motion in a suit by a poultry distributor against a poultry dealer.

By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan

9 minute read