May 19, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Subrogation: Primer and Recent Environmental Cleanup CasesIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write that in the last few years, insurance disputes concerning subrogation rights related to claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation Liability Act have yielded several interesting decisions.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
10 minute read
May 18, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Subrogation: Primer and Recent Environmental Cleanup CasesIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write that in the last few years, insurance disputes concerning subrogation rights related to claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation Liability Act have yielded several interesting decisions.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
10 minute read
March 03, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Return to the Bear Stearns' D&O Insurance DisputeIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write that a lawsuit in which Bear Stearns sought indemnification from its insurers after settlements with the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange and private plaintiffs in related suits has already yielded five motion rulings in just over four years regarding disgorgement; public policy; and final adjudication requirements.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
11 minute read
March 03, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Return to the Bear Stearns' D&O Insurance DisputeIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write that a lawsuit in which Bear Stearns sought indemnification from its insurers after settlements with the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange and private plaintiffs in related suits has already yielded five motion rulings in just over four years regarding disgorgement; public policy; and final adjudication requirements.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
11 minute read
December 29, 2014 | New York Law Journal
Direct Loss Requirement in Fidelity Insurance BondsIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes of Schulte Roth & Zabel discuss a case in which primary and excess insurers denied coverage and ultimately commenced a lawsuit seeking an order confirming their disclaimer position.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
11 minute read
September 29, 2014 | New York Law Journal
Hurricane Sandy: Courts Begin Issuing Insurance RulingsIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write: As we approach the two-year anniversary of Hurricane Sandy, we review the impact that policy provisions concerning flood and water damage and physical damage requirements have had on insurance disputes concerning Sandy-related claims.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
10 minute read
July 15, 2014 | New York Law Journal
Related Claims Are in the Eye of the BeholderIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write: Under the terms of typical professional liability and directors' and officers' insurance policies, multiple claims that arise out of interrelated wrongful acts are treated as a single claim deemed to have been first made at the time the first of the related claims was made against the insured. Whether the treatment of multiple related claims as a single claim benefits the insured or the insurer depends on the circumstances.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
11 minute read
May 06, 2014 | New York Law Journal
'K2' and Consequences of Insurers' Breach of Duty to DefendIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write: The recent decision in 'K2-II' does not alter the landmark Court of Appeals' decision issued in 'Isadore Rosen & Sons.' The K2-II decision makes clear that in the absence of a covered loss, the insurer simply has no duty to indemnify. In contrast, under Isadore Rosen, an insurer that breaches the duty to defend a claim for loss that is covered under the policy will be held liable for the insured's reasonable settlement of that claim—regardless of whether the insurer consented to such settlement.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
12 minute read
March 04, 2014 | New York Law Journal
Are Private Companies' Liability Risks Adequately Insured?In their Corporate Insurance Law column, Schulte Roth & Zabel's Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes write: We live in a litigious society and, as a result, many publicly owned companies may view litigation costs and insurance premiums as simply costs of doing business. In many respects, private companies face risks similar to those faced by public companies, yet they may not take the same approach with regard to insurance. A recent survey suggests that many private companies are not adequately insured.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
9 minute read
December 11, 2013 | New York Law Journal
Key Rulings Concerning Cleanup of Former Grumman SitesIn their Corporate Insurance Law column, Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes of Schulte Roth & Zabel analyze a recent decision involving remediation of environmental contamination claims that addresses several important issues including the scope of the insurer's defense obligation where only some claims are potentially covered, reporting of claims in the context of consecutive claims-made policies and late notice of claims and occurrences.
By Howard B. Epstein and Theodore A. Keyes
10 minute read
Trending Stories