NEXT

Iclc

Iclc

April 22, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Schoch v. Lake Champlain OB-GYN, P.C.

The New York State Court of Appeals considers the argument from attorneys representing the medical professionals named as policyholders on the insurance policies, that the money should go to their clients.

By ICLC Editors

1 minute read

April 19, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc.; DP Milk Street Inc.

In a potentially quite serious blow to franchising, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently held that Massachusetts' labor laws can be applied to the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Or, put more simply, that franchisees may be employees under Massachusetts law.

By ICLC Editors

23 minute read

April 15, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Tonoga, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.

As PFAS litigation continues to spur throughout product supply chains, and as new regulations go into effect to mitigate environmental and health impacts of PFAS, policyholders will increasingly turn to insurance carriers to cover losses.

By ICLC Editors

14 minute read

April 15, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Wolverine World Wide, Inc. v. American Insurance Co.

As PFAS litigation continues to spur throughout product supply chains, and as new regulations go into effect to mitigate environmental and health impacts of PFAS, policyholders will increasingly turn to insurance carriers to cover losses.

By ICLC Editors

40 minute read

April 15, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Colony Ins. Co. v. Buckeye Fire Equipment Co.

As PFAS litigation continues to spur throughout product supply chains, and as new regulations go into effect to mitigate environmental and health impacts of PFAS, policyholders will increasingly turn to insurance carriers to cover losses.

By ICLC Editors

11 minute read

April 11, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Suez Treatment Sols., Inc. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.

The court decided in favor of an insured, reaffirming the broad duty to defend in New York and recognizing that in some cases, more than one carrier can have a duty to defend.

By ICLC Editors

48 minute read

April 05, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ironics, Inc.

The Ohio Supreme Court has declined to adopt the "integrated system" rule as a means of avoiding coverage for losses involving property damage due to the incorporation of the insured's product into a larger whole.

By ICLC Editors

70 minute read

April 01, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

G.M.M. v. Kimpson

"Justice should mean the same thing for every American. That's why we need to make big, systemic changes to the way civil damages are determined in this country, to recognize the value of every life and to end the implementation of discriminatory calculations," said Sue Steinman of the American Association for Justice.

By ICLC Editors

75 minute read

April 01, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

JN Contemporary Art LLC v. Phillips Auctioneers LLC

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a district court's ruling granting a defendant auctioneer's motion to dismiss, finding the COVID-19 pandemic created "a circumstance beyond the parties' reasonable control" as outlined in the force majeure clause of an agreement for the sale of a painting.

By ICLC Editors

23 minute read

March 29, 2022 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Tex. Pol. Subdivisions Property/Casualty Joint Self Ins. Fund

Instead of looking solely to the allegations in the pleadings and the terms of the insurance policy, Texas courts may now look beyond the eight corners of those documents to extrinsic evidence under certain circumstances.

By ICLC Editors

28 minute read