NEXT

Jacqueline Thomsen

Jacqueline Thomsen

Jacqueline Thomsen, based in Washington, is a reporter covering D.C. federal courts and the legal side of politics. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @jacq_thomsen.

Connect with this author

June 14, 2021 | National Law Journal

'No Amount of Apologizing': Judge Scolds DOJ, but Pauses Release of Trump Prosecution Memo

"The department chose not to tell the court the purpose of the memorandum or subject it addressed at all, and no amount of apologizing for 'imprecision' in the language it did use can cure the impact of that fundamental omission," U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

7 minute read

June 14, 2021 | National Law Journal

Republicans Hire Former Trump Official Ken Cuccinelli for Lawsuit Over House Security Rule

Cuccinelli is listed as one of the attorneys on a lawsuit filed by GOP Reps. Louie Gohmert and Andrew Clyde, who allege a House security screening rule is being selectively applied to Republicans and not Democrats.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

5 minute read

June 11, 2021 | National Law Journal

'Cannot Be Secret Proceedings': Petition Wants Video Access to Virtual Court Hearings

"There is no doubt that the pandemic provides a compelling reason for remote courtrooms. It does not, however, provide a reason to exclude the public from watching what happens in those remote courtrooms, a practice that therefore violates the First Amendment," the filing reads.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

6 minute read

June 11, 2021 | Law.com

Bench Report: These Judicial Nominees' Credentials Aren't Winning Over Republicans.

Senate Republicans seem to have found their in-road to criticizing President Joe Biden's nominees: Their defense-heavy credentials.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

8 minute read

June 09, 2021 | National Law Journal

An Ethics Complaint Against Bill Barr Was Rejected, and It Has Lawyers Worried

Disciplinary counsel in D.C. said they generally do not "intervene in matters that are currently and publicly being discussed in the national political arena." One legal ethics expert said that explanation "seems dangerously overbroad."

By Jacqueline Thomsen

9 minute read

June 09, 2021 | National Law Journal

Republicans Skeptical of Biden Nominees' Judicial Philosophies and Experience

"Certainly I have, as I said, no specific experience in most of those topics that you raised. But I am very confident in my ability to get up to speed and to handle the cases that come before me," said one nominee in response to the Republican questioning.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

5 minute read

June 09, 2021 | National Law Journal

Stressing 'Adherence to the Rule of Law,'' Merrick Garland Defends DOJ's Support of Trump-Era Stances

"Sometimes it means that we have to make a decision about the law that we would never have made, that we strongly disagree with as a matter of policy," Garland said.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

3 minute read

June 08, 2021 | National Law Journal

After Long Legal Battles, Congress Debates How to Fix 'Broken Down' Process for Subpoenas

Days after former White House counsel Don McGahn testified as part of a settlement reached to end a two-year court fight, lawmakers seem ready to make changes to how congressional subpoenas are enforced.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

5 minute read

June 04, 2021 | National Law Journal

Cool or Cringe? Judicial Pop Culture References Rankle Some Lawyers

Lawyers and legal experts said they believe it's important for judicial opinions to be accessible to the general public, but they're split on whether the pop culture references are effective in achieving that goal.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

8 minute read

June 03, 2021 | National Law Journal

Ted Cruz and Chuck Cooper See Victory, as Court Finds Campaign Money Rule Clashes With First Amendment

"With little connection to any actual or perceived quid pro quo corruption interest, the FEC's asserted rationale boils down to a general concern about money in politics and campaign contributions to incumbents—but such general concerns about influence or access cannot justify government regulation in the vital area of political speech," the court ruled.

By Jacqueline Thomsen

5 minute read