August 30, 2002 | Law.com
Respondeat Superior Applies to Online ActivityUsing the Internet, employees can copy and distribute confidential information from their office computer, send sexually harassing or threatening messages via e-mail, and engage in fraudulent activities. A properly prepared and fully implemented Internet-use policy is among an employer's best defenses against liability under respondeat superior.
By Jonathan Bick
10 minute read
February 16, 2004 | National Law Journal
Congress Has Come to Control Spam, Not to Bury ItCyberlaw: Contrary to public opinion, the CAN-SPAM Act does not make spam unlawful; it attempts to regulate it. But it may not be successful.
By Jonathan Bick
9 minute read
May 09, 2002 | Law.com
Avoid the Hyper-Liability of HyperlinksCompanies that maintain Web sites must be vigilant to scrutinize the substance of the sites, including content accessible via Internet links from the company's site to a third-party site. If not, the potentially deceptive nature of hyperlinks can lead to direct and derivative liability arising from actively using hyperlinks and from passively allowing others to hyperlink to an existing Web site.
By Jonathan Bick
13 minute read
June 21, 2004 | National Law Journal
Putting Your E-signature on the Dotted LineCyberlaw: Six viable options for businesses looking to replace traditional signatures with lawful electronic ones.
By Jonathan Bick
8 minute read
May 09, 2003 | Law.com
Spam-Related Class Actions Are on the HorizonBulk, unsolicited, commercial e-mail -- spam -- is generally recognized as an undesirable, harmful nuisance and responses, including traditional litigation, have been less than effective. A spam class action brought under FRCP 23(b)(3) or the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act against the U.S. government, ISPs and others who facilitate spam may be a viable alternative.
By Jonathan Bick
15 minute read
May 16, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
The Reality of Virtual ADRThe Internet is having a profound effect on the development of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. It is used as a means for the resolution of conflict both directly, through the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy process, and indirectly, by offering traditional ADR process opportunities to remote parties. This article explores the pros and cons of these developments.
By Jonathan Bick
7 minute read
May 05, 2003 | Law.com
Spam-Related Class Actions Are on the HorizonBulk, unsolicited, commercial e-mail -- spam -- is generally recognized as an undesirable, harmful nuisance and responses, including traditional litigation, have been less than effective. A spam class action against the U.S. government, Internet Service Providers and others who facilitate spam may be appropriate.
By Jonathan Bick
15 minute read
November 14, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal
Internet Ticket SalesSome state anti-scalping laws have been applied to Internet ticketing transactions, resulting in both criminal and civil sanctions. However, the application of proper Internet notices and appropriate Web site access limitations may render such state anti-scalping laws moot.
By Jonathan Bick
7 minute read
December 15, 2005 | Legaltech News
Preserve E-Meeting ConfidentialityThanks to the Internet, e-meetings have made business communication easier and more efficient. But the underlying technology -- which copies and then transfers content from server to server -- results in novel legal difficulties. The concept of "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the context of Internet activities is constantly shifting. Is the solution a set of Internet communication industry standards for reasonable expectations associated with information sharing, such as securing informed consent?
By Jonathan Bick
6 minute read
September 23, 2004 | Law.com
Internet Communications Pose New Liability IssuesThanks to client demand for cutting-edge communications, many law firms offer protected access to personal case information over the Internet. Communicating through a Web site can be fast, efficient and cost-effective. But providing confidential information can increase a firm's legal liability -- and courts and bar associations offer little guidance. Find out how to limit your firm's risk.
By Jonathan Bick
7 minute read
Trending Stories