August 22, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
United States v. SmithIn this trial for threatening federal officers with a gun, the introduction of evidence that defendant had been seen dealing drugs on the same street corner two years earlier violated Rule 404(b).
By Judith Nallin
5 minute read
July 05, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
Heyert v. TaddeseThe landlords' levy of a rent that exceeded the city's rent-control ordinance subjected them to liability under the Consumer Fraud Act.
By Judith Nallin
6 minute read
April 25, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
State v. RockfordNo bright-line rule precludes the use of a flash-bang device in the execution of a knock-and-announce warrant; the objective reasonableness of a search using such a device must be determined on a case-by-case basis considering the totality of the evidence.
By Judith Nallin
6 minute read
July 18, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal
Verizon New Jersey Inc. v. Hopewell BoroughThe 51 percent test in N.J.S.A. 54:4-1 is to be performed annually as of the assessment date; 54:4-1 comports with federal and state guarantees of equal protection, does not constitute special legislation, and does not violate the Uniformity Clause.
By By Judith Nallin
6 minute read
April 10, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
State v. GomezCourts have inherent authority to order a victim to undergo a physical exam by a defense doctor if the defendant has shown a compelling or substantial need for the exam that outweighs the victim's rights, including constitutional and statutory protections.
By By Judith Nallin
6 minute read
May 09, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
Reese v. WeisIn determining whether alimony should be modified or terminated because of the dependent spouse's cohabitation, a court may consider enhancements to the dependent spouse's lifestyle conferred by the cohabitation.
By Judith Nallin
6 minute read
August 01, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal
In the Matter of the Registrant T.H.Criterion seven of the Registrant Risk Assessment Scale — length of time since last arrest — has a built-in change of circumstances and is, by its terms, subject to review.
By Judith Nallin
4 minute read
May 31, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal
Correctional Medical Services Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsNeither the deliberative process privilege nor the official information privilege protects the documents plaintiff seeks in this breach-of-contract action.
By By Judith Nallin
5 minute read
August 30, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal
United States v. StoerrA felon's employer that voluntarily paid restitution to one of his victims does not have standing to appeal the denial of its motion for restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act.
By By Judith Nallin
5 minute read
August 30, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal
Mendoza v. United StatesMendoza's delay in pursuing relief based on counsel's failure to advise of the deportation consequences of his guilty plea bars his petition for a writ of error coram nobis.
By By Judith Nallin
5 minute read