Leo Milonas

January 05, 2006 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, review notable decisions and discuss significant legal developments in New York law from fall 2005.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

September 04, 2008 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, review recent decisions on FOIL requests, negligence and the leash law, search warrants and GPS surveillance, failure to administer the oath to prospective jurors, the use of stun belts on criminal defendants, and the zoning of a proposed wind farm.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

June 19, 2006 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, litigation partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, review recent decisions from the four Departments of the Appellate Division, including one holding a defendant charged in a twin count indictment was properly found guilty of depraved indifference murder, another stating that the domestic partner of a 9/11 victim could sue the victim's brother who had kept her share of the award from the Compensation Fund, and more.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

December 18, 2007 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, write that the Appellate Divisions are closing out 2007 with ground-breaking decisions that advance New York law on numerous fronts, including rent stabilization, securities fraud, medical confidentiality, public health law and vicarious liability.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

June 17, 2005 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman,write that ith the arrival of spring, the four departments of New York's Appellate Division have showered us with a flood of work product and issued a wide range of decisions, many of first impression.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

June 04, 2007 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, review the most recent three months of activity in the Appellate Division's four departments, which have yielded a number of groundbreaking decisions.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

11 minute read

September 09, 2009 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, discuss recent appellate decisions of interest that touch on topics such as the legislative and executive branches' widely publicized failure to enact a long-overdue increase in salaries for New York judges, the viability of claims of fraud based on deliberate spoliation of evidence, the transfer of securities endorsed by a person who had not yet been adjudicated incompetent, Governor Paterson's appointment of Richard Ravitch as Lieutenant-Governor, and more.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

11 minute read

December 30, 2008 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, write that the May 2005 collapse of a retaining wall onto the Henry Hudson Parkway required the First Department's Presiding Justice Jonathan Lippman to consider the quantum of proof necessary to satisfy a rarely construed provision of the Civil PLR and review other decisions of note.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

April 15, 2011 | New York Law Journal

In their Appellate Division Review, E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, anaylze recent rulings in tax cases, same-sex marriage suits, statute of limitations questions and more.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

12 minute read

March 01, 2007 | New York Law Journal

E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, review recent decisions by New York's intermediate appellate courts, including a ruling that a member of a limited liability company has standing to bring a derivative suit even though the LLC Law does not specifically grant such a right, another that banks may report a forged check on a customer's account orally, and one that held the city immune from suit over notification of a teacher's tuberculosis diagnosis.

By E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie

11 minute read