NEXT

Martin

Martin

March 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Cruel but Not Unusual: The Sentence Recommended for Sam Bankman-Fried

John S. Martin, former district judge and U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, presents his take on the U.S. Probation Department's recommended 100-year sentence for Sam Bankman-Fried.

By John S. Martin

6 minute read

March 04, 2024 | New York Law Journal

The Deadly Force 'PIT Maneuver' Case

Fourth Amendment law provides that police use of force during an arrest, stop or other seizure must be reasonable. Despite the seemingly straightforward nature of the reasonableness standard, §1983 excessive force claims often generate many difficult issues. The recent decision in 'Sabbe v. Washington County Board of Commissioners' illustrates some of these issues.

By Martin A. Schwartz

13 minute read

February 27, 2024 | New York Law Journal

'The Resource Group International v. Chishti'

In 'The Resource Group International v. Chishti', the Second Circuit considered the propriety of a pending arbitration and whether being improperly forced to arbitrate can satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction. It vacated and remanded the district court's order denying a motion for preliminary injunction that would have stayed the arbitration.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

8 minute read

February 14, 2024 | New York Law Journal

'Yellowstone' Injunctions: Navigating the Wild West of Commercial Lease Disputes

Yellowstone injunctions are implicated in many leases for commercial real estate property in New York State, however most landlords and tenants do not know what it is or how it affects them. This article offers an overview of their implications so that commercial landlords and tenants can better navigate lease disputes.

By Janet Kljyan and Charles F. Martin III

6 minute read

January 30, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Injury-in-Fact in Discrimination Cases

The Second Circuit, in a rare en banc ruling, unanimously held that plaintiffs alleging discriminatory treatment in violation of Title IX had sufficiently alleged an injury-in-fact for standing purposes. But the court diverged on a number of other standing issues. The splintered nature of the court's opinions illustrates the underlying tension between ensuring access to courts and enforcing appropriate limitations on judicial power.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

8 minute read

December 29, 2023 | New York Law Journal

Timeliness of Section 1983 Sexual Abuse of Minor Claims

In 2019, the New York Legislature enacted the Child Victim's Act, which revived claims of sexual abuse against a child who was less than 18 years old when the abuse occurred that were barred by the statute of limitations. The statute clearly applies to claims based on New York state law, but does the New York law also apply to §1983 claims?

By Martin A. Schwartz

10 minute read

December 27, 2023 | New York Law Journal

Expanding Free Exercise Claims

In Kravitz v. Purcell, the Second Circuit considered whether incarcerated plaintiffs must show a substantial burden on their religious beliefs to prevail on free exercise claims under U.S.C. 42 §1983.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

7 minute read

December 12, 2023 | New Jersey Law Journal

The 'TDF' Litigations—Deconstructing Product Liability Law

Legal liability for the manufacture and sale of dangerous products can arise in different ways. Consumers harmed by such products often suffer significant property loss and/or grievous personal injuries and assert claims under the New Jersey Products Liability Act. Plaintiffs in Products Liability Act cases can be, but sometimes are not, purchasers of the products that caused them harm.

By Martin P. Schrama, Stefanie Colella-Walsh and Jack Rutherford

9 minute read

November 21, 2023 | New York Law Journal

Expanding the Scope of 'Securities-Related' Exception to the Class Action Fairness Act

In 'Krasner', the Second Circuit considered whether the securities-related exception to the federal jurisdiction conferred by CAFA prohibited removal to federal court of a class action alleging aiding and abetting the breach of fiduciary duties and tortious interference claims. This decision is another instance where the circuit has adopted an expansive interpretation of the exception.

By Martin Flumenbaum and Brad S. Karp

7 minute read

November 13, 2023 | Global Leaders in Law

The Month - October Edition

In this edition of The Month we explore the economic importance of diversity.

By Amanda Martin

0 minute read