March 18, 2021 | The Legal Intelligencer
Evolving Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Cases"In the beginning …," the statute of limitations for legal malpractice appeared clear: two years commencing from final disposition of the underlying action.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
4 minute read
December 10, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer
'Gist of the Action Doctrine' as Applied to the Statute of LimitationsAn action in legal malpractice negligence has a two-year statute of limitations. An action in legal malpractice breach of contract has a four-year statute of limitations.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
4 minute read
September 17, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer
A Primer on Attorney Liabilities: Be Prepared for BattleTo meet the elements of a legal malpractice action the claimed malpracticing attorney must be demonstrated as having deviated from the standard of care. The mere happening of a "mal"—result does not equate to "mal"—practice. An attorney is immune upon the exercise of reasoned "professional judgment."
By Matthew B. Weisberg
7 minute read
June 11, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer
COVID-19 Illustrates 'Glaring' Issues in Pa. Court SystemDuring this pandemic, the nonuniform (i.e., county-by-county) nature of Pennsylvania's court systems and rules of practice were—and are—glaring.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
6 minute read
March 12, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer
Professional Judgment Immunity in Legal Malpractice CasesEvery professional has the right to use their "professional judgment." That is, a mal result does not necessarily mean malpractice if the adverse result was causative of the use of the professional's judgment.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
8 minute read
September 12, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer
The Dragonetti Act: A Tale of Statutory InterpretationThe common law cause of action for wrongful use of civil proceedings has been codified at 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 8352, et seq. The statute is referred to as the Dragonetti Act.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
6 minute read
June 11, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer
Recusal: A Request That Should Not be Made LightlyThe standard of review for recusal is “abuse of discretion.” Unlike other jurisdictions, there is no statutory or rule-based procedure for recusal in Pennsylvania.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
7 minute read
March 14, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer
Legal Malpractice: Tolling and the Statute of LimitationsThe legal malpractice negligence statute of limitations is two years. The legal malpractice breach of contract statute of limitations is four years, as in Coleman v. Duane Morris, 58 A.3d 833 (Pa. Super. 2012).
By Matthew B. Weisberg
8 minute read
December 13, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer
Economic Loss/Gist of the Action Doctrine(s): RevisitedIn this column on attorney liabilities, this author has oft discussed the legal malpractice statute of limitations as in flux. In light of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent holding in Dittman, the legal malpractice statute of limitations in light of the economic loss/gist of the action doctrine(s) (the doctrine) must be revisited.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
5 minute read
September 13, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer
Breach of Contract Statute of Limitations as Applied to the 'Gist of the Action' DoctrineIn Coleman v. Duane Morris, 58 A.3d 833 (Pa. Super. 2012), the Superior Court precedentially established two causes arising from legal malpractice: negligence; and breach of contract.
By Matthew B. Weisberg
7 minute read
Trending Stories