NEXT

Max Mitchell

Max Mitchell

Max Mitchell is ALM's Regional Managing Editor for The Legal Intelligencer, New Jersey Law Journal, Delaware Business Court Insider and Delaware Law Weekly. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI. His email is [email protected].

Connect with this author

May 06, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Allegheny Jury Awards Plaintiff for Delayed Diagnosis

According to a the plaintiff's pretrial memorandum, in the evening of Sept. 28, 2010, Thomas Mol, who was 34 and working as a financial manager, presented to the emergency room of the Forbes Regional Hospital. During the visit, Mol was seen by Dr. Elizabeth Moy, who was employed by EMP of Allegheny County LTD. The memo said that Mol complained of back pain and numbness. A CT scan was performed, and Night Hawk Radiology interpreted the readout. The memo said that Mol was sent home even though he was unable to walk under his own power.

By Max Mitchell

6 minute read

May 06, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Slot Machine Awards Can Be Subtracted From Taxable Revenue

Promotional awards that casinos give to slot machine players can be subtracted from slot machine revenues for tax purposes, the state Supreme Court has ruled.

By Max Mitchell

6 minute read

May 06, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Bankruptcy Court Fraud Finding Doesn't Apply to Civil Suit

A finding of fraud in U.S. Bankruptcy Court does not mean that the issue has already been decided for liability purposes in Pennsylvania courts, the state Superior Court has ruled in an apparent issue of first impression.

By Max Mitchell

5 minute read

May 06, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Mortgage Protection Law Doesn't Extend to Collection Counsel

The Loan Interest and Protection Act, which prohibits residential mortgage lenders from collecting excessive fees and charges, does not provide a plaintiff a cause of action to sue a lender's attorney for allegedly collecting excessive fees, the state Superior Court has ruled.

By Max Mitchell

6 minute read

May 06, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Statutory Damages Cap Tops Supreme Court Arguments

Kicking off an oral argument session packed with first-impression issues, the state Supreme Court justices are set to hear arguments about the constitutionality of a statutory damages cap that slashed an injured student's $14 million verdict against the state to $500,000.

By Max Mitchell

5 minute read

May 02, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Justices Uphold Decision on Unheard Threat as Parole Violation

The state Supreme Court has agreed that a person who, according to an appeals court opinion, threatened to "kill" a man and "feed him to the pigs" had engaged in assaultive behavior, even when the threats were not communicated to the intended target and no actions were taken to implement the threats.

By Max Mitchell

2 minute read

April 29, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Third Circuit Question Over Bad-Faith Claims to Be Heard by State Justices

The state Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether an insured tortfeasor can assign bad-faith claims against his insurance carrier to the injured plaintiff.

By Max Mitchell

5 minute read

April 29, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Union Trustees Can't Impose Mechanic's Lien, Justices Rule

The beneficiaries of a union's employee benefits trust fund will not be able to pursue a mechanic's lien claim against the developer of a project that the beneficiaries worked on, the state Supreme Court has ruled.

By Max Mitchell

5 minute read

April 29, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Judge Curbs Defense Seeking Multiple Exams of Plaintiff

Defendants may not require multiple physical examinations of plaintiffs in cases where different doctors treated separate orthopedic conditions, a Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas judge has ruled.

By Max Mitchell

5 minute read

April 29, 2014 | The Legal Intelligencer

Dive Into PSU Sanctions Shows Breadth of Judicial Discretion

A Commonwealth Court decision questioning the consent decree between Penn State and the NCAA that imposed $60 million in monetary sanctions over the Jerry Sandusky child sex-abuse scandal exemplifies the broad discretion of judges in determining what issues should be considered, attorneys and court watchers told Pennsylvania Law Weekly.

By Max Mitchell

6 minute read


More from ALM