June 30, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Playing To Win: Defending Clients in Parallel ProceedingsTen considerations that are key to a winning trial strategy for a party taking the Fifth.
By Michael C. Miller and Michael G. Scavelli
13 minute read
April 19, 2021 | New York Law Journal
'Blaszczak' and the ITPA: Toward a Statutory Definition for Insider Trading?This article, the second in a series discussing insider trading law, considers the options for national legislation defining insider trading.
By Michael C. Miller, Michelle Levin, Bruce Bishop and David Hirsch
8 minute read
November 25, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Insider Trading on Government InformationThis article discusses recent events giving rise to concerns about insider trading, the scope of insider-trading laws as they apply to government officials and alleged tippees, and whether the change in administration is likely to result in a greater focus on insider trading based on government information.
By Michael C. Miller, Michelle Levin, Bruce Bishop and David Hirsch
9 minute read
January 08, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Attorney Convictions in New YorkThis article updates the authors' original survey with a review of criminal convictions of New York lawyers from January 2015 through December 2019.
By Michael C. Miller and Morgan Lucas
8 minute read
September 29, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Judiciary Law §487: Potency of Claims Has GrownMatthew J. Herrington and Michael C. Miller write: Although cases and success rates for claims invoking the attorney misconduct statute have risen—even doubled—over the past five years, there appears to be no change in the severity of misconduct required for an actionable claim. Given the clarification in 2009's seminal 'Amalfitano v. Rosenberg' that even attempted deceit was actionable, the post-Amalfitano consistency in the severity standard is arguably surprising and provides some comfort.
By Matthew J. Herrington and Michael C. Miller
11 minute read
September 28, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Judiciary Law §487: Potency of Claims Has GrownMatthew J. Herrington and Michael C. Miller write: Although cases and success rates for claims invoking the attorney misconduct statute have risen—even doubled—over the past five years, there appears to be no change in the severity of misconduct required for an actionable claim. Given the clarification in 2009's seminal 'Amalfitano v. Rosenberg' that even attempted deceit was actionable, the post-Amalfitano consistency in the severity standard is arguably surprising and provides some comfort.
By Matthew J. Herrington and Michael C. Miller
11 minute read
January 09, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Attorneys in Hot Water: When Prosecutors Turn Up the HeatMichael C. Miller and Jill C. Maguire discuss the results of their informal survey into the criminal convictions that have been obtained over the past few years against lawyers in New York's federal and state courts, and against New York lawyers who have run afoul of the law outside of New York State.
By Michael C. Miller and Jill C. Maguire
10 minute read
January 09, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Attorneys in Hot Water: When Prosecutors Turn Up the HeatMichael C. Miller and Jill C. Maguire discuss the results of their informal survey into the criminal convictions that have been obtained over the past few years against lawyers in New York's federal and state courts, and against New York lawyers who have run afoul of the law outside of New York State.
By Michael C. Miller and Jill C. Maguire
10 minute read
October 08, 2010 | Law.com
The Price of Discovery in New York CourtsBecause New York litigants must finance their own suits, they have a strong incentive to formulate minimally burdensome discovery requests. However, Steptoe & Johnson's Michael Miller, Evan Glassman and Anthony Onorato note that cost allocation can also be used as leverage against one's opponents.
By Michael C. Miller, Evan Glassman and Anthony Onorato
29 minute read
March 14, 2013 | New York Law Journal
LIBOR Manipulation: Two Critical Points of InterestMichael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson, and Lara Romansic, of counsel at the firm, discuss rescission, which may be a potential solution to the determination of damages caused by LIBOR manipulation, an extremely difficult problem given the nature of LIBOR calculation, and statutes of limitations under various claims an individual plaintiff might put forth.
By Michael C. Miller and Lara Romansic
11 minute read