NEXT

Michael E. Bertin

Michael E. Bertin

August 11, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

Entire Amount of Attorney Fees Request Warranted in Child Support Case

On April 8, 2008, The Legal Intelligencer published my article regarding the Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Krebs v. Krebs (hereafter referred to as Krebs I).

By Michael E. Bertin

8 minute read

December 13, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

Superior Court Analyzes Relocation Under New Custody Act

The recent case of E.D. v. M.P., filed on Nov. 9, is very important for family law attorneys as it is the first reported appellate case pertaining to child custody relocation under the new Child Custody Act.

By Michael E. Bertin

10 minute read

February 10, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

Incarceration Terminates Child Support, Remits Arrears in Plunkard

As most family law practitioners are aware, the 2007 Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Nash v. Herbster was a case of first impression applying the then fairly new Rule 1910.19(f) to incarceration as being a substantial change in circumstances for purposes modifying or terminating child support, after considering the official comment to said rule.

By Michael E. Bertin

8 minute read

April 14, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

Pa. Child Custody Jurisdiction Lost Despite Parent Remaining in Pa.

In 2004, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania adopted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, or UCCJEA. The UCCJEA replaced the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, or UCCJA. It was believed that the UCCJEA would solve many of the problems that occurred under the UCCJA regarding child custody jurisdictional disputes.

By Michael E. Bertin

8 minute read

February 12, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

De Novo Review Required of Parenting Coordination Decisions

A parenting coordinator is an individual who is appointed by the court in custody cases to assist in executing and enforcing ancillary issues of a custody order. Parenting coordination has become a hot issue in the area of Pennsylvania child custody.

By Michael E. Bertin

6 minute read

February 12, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

Child Support Ordered for 19-Year-Old With Physical Disability

In the recent Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Kotzbauer v. Kotzbauer, the Superior Court affirmed the trial court's granting of child support to a mother of a 19-year-old college student with a physical disability.

By Michael E. Bertin

9 minute read

August 13, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

Child Relocation Decisions to Be Explained Near Time of Ruling

The evolution of the courts' application of the new child custody statute continues at a consistent pace. A recurring issue that has been addressed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court pertains to the requirement of the trial court to provide the reasons for its decisions in custody cases on the record in open court or in a written opinion or order.

By Michael E. Bertin

7 minute read

October 19, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

Calculating Child Support: Private School, Stock Options, Perks and 401(K)s

The recent Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Murphy v. McDermott provides the family law practitioner with reminders and clarifications as to calculating a party's income for support purposes.

By Michael E. Bertin

8 minute read

June 10, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

Statute Requires Collection of Child Support Arrears From Injury Settlement

The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently addressed the application of the relatively new Domestic Relations Statute 23 Pa.C.S.A. Section 4308.1 pertaining to "Collection of Overdue Support for Monetary Awards," in the case of Faust v. Walker. Interestingly, the appellant in this case was the domestic relations office of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas.

By Michael E. Bertin

8 minute read

October 11, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

Money Received From Will Contest Not Considered Marital Property

In the recent case of Strauss v. Strauss, an interesting issue arose regarding whether monies received by Brian Strauss as part of a will contest were to be considered marital property subject to equitable distribution in the parties' divorce action or Brian Strauss' separate estate not subject to equitable distribution.

By Michael E. Bertin

7 minute read