February 03, 2016 | New York Law Journal
The Exhibiting Requirement in Post-Foreclosure EvictionsIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren Estis and Michael Feinstein discuss the case 'Deutsche Bank v. Dirende,' which held that "exhibiting" the referee's deed in a post-foreclosure eviction requires personal delivery.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
9 minute read
December 09, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Yellowstone Injunctions: Timeliness Is CriticalIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the case 'Riesenburger Properties v. PI Associates' to highlight the critical importance of filing a motion for Yellowstone relief prior to the expiration of the cure period.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
9 minute read
December 08, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Yellowstone Injunctions: Timeliness Is CriticalIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the case 'Riesenburger Properties v. PI Associates' to highlight the critical importance of filing a motion for Yellowstone relief prior to the expiration of the cure period.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
9 minute read
October 07, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Failure to Cite Lease Provision in Notice to Cure Is FatalIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss 'Fabria Houses Assoc. v. Fontanetta,' writing that the case serves as a reminder that the failure to identify in the notice to cure the specific lease provisions being violated will have fatal consequences.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
9 minute read
October 06, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Failure to Cite Lease Provision in Notice to Cure Is FatalIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss 'Fabria Houses Assoc. v. Fontanetta,' writing that the case serves as a reminder that the failure to identify in the notice to cure the specific lease provisions being violated will have fatal consequences.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
9 minute read
August 05, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Landlord's Rent Demands Ruled 'Deceptive' Under GBL 349In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the case 'Bryant v. Casco Bay Realty,' and advise residential landlords to make sure that rent demands are sufficiently specific and demand only such amounts that are due as "rent" under the parties' lease, avoiding ancillary "non-rent charges."
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
10 minute read
August 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Landlord's Rent Demands Ruled 'Deceptive' Under GBL 349In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the case 'Bryant v. Casco Bay Realty,' and advise residential landlords to make sure that rent demands are sufficiently specific and demand only such amounts that are due as "rent" under the parties' lease, avoiding ancillary "non-rent charges."
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
10 minute read
June 03, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Fate of Acceleration Clause After Landlord Retakes the PropertyIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the Court of Appeals decision in '172 Van Duzer Realty v. Globe Alumni' on the enforceability of an acceleration clause after the landlord retakes possession of the premises.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
10 minute read
June 02, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Fate of Acceleration Clause After Landlord Retakes the PropertyIn their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the Court of Appeals decision in '172 Van Duzer Realty v. Globe Alumni' on the enforceability of an acceleration clause after the landlord retakes possession of the premises.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
10 minute read
April 01, 2015 | New York Law Journal
Attorney Fees Under RPL Section 234Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the recent case 'Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor,' where the Court of Appeals held that the lease provision at issue invoked the reciprocal mandate of Real Property Law Section 234.
By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein
9 minute read
Trending Stories