August 30, 2022 | Daily Business Review
All the Banks, Billionaires and VCs Sucked Into Twitter v. MuskHere are the people and firms each side has subpoenaed so far.
By Jennah Haque, Patricia Hurtado and Elizabeth L. T. Moore
7 minute read
August 19, 2022 | New York Law Journal
Notice of Entry in the NYSCEF EraNow that NYSCEF is standard for appeals throughout the state, serving notice of entry is easier than ever. But variation among the judicial departments has created confusion and opened the possibility for gamesmanship.
By David J. Goldsmith and John Moore
5 minute read
August 01, 2022 | New York Law Journal
Dead Man's Statute: A Potentially Powerful Evidentiary RuleThis column discusses the Dead Man's Statute and decisional law addressing its potential application in both circumstances.
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
13 minute read
July 13, 2022 | Daily Business Review
Social Platforms Fail to Keep LGBTQ+ Users Safe, GLAAD SaysTikTok updated its Community Guidelines to explicitly prohibit misgendering, deadnaming, the practice of referring to trans people by the name they were assigned at birth, and misogyny, after prompting by GLAAD, an organization that fights hate against gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer people, and UltraViolet, a female-empowerment organization.
By Elizabeth Moore
5 minute read
June 06, 2022 | New York Law Journal
Liability for Violating Directives To Forgo Life-Sustaining TreatmentA person's right to decide to forgo life-sustaining treatment is recognized in this state, but whether a violation of that right gives rise to liability in tort has somehow been called into question.
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
14 minute read
April 04, 2022 | New York Law Journal
Departure From Accepted Standards: Navigating the Hindsight RuleThe rule prohibiting hindsight in medical malpractice actions is often the subject of misapplication and misuse. In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas Moore and Matthew Gaier clear things up by distinguishing the type of subsequent evidence that is prohibited as impermissible hindsight from admissible deductions based on circumstantial evidence.
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
12 minute read
January 31, 2022 | New York Law Journal
Quality Assurance Privilege and Party StatementsOne area of statutory privilege that has implications for medical malpractice actions is that relating to hospital quality assurance review and malpractice prevention programs under Education Law §6527(3), Public Health Law §2805-j and Public Health Law §2805-m. The statutes, however, exempt from privilege statements made by a party in an action that is the subject of the review. This exception has been addressed in various appellate decisions. In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas Moore and Matthew Gaier discuss several of the decisions.
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
14 minute read
December 06, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Proper Venue for Malpractice ActionsA circumstance sometimes arises in medical malpractice actions where venue is decided based upon a physician's principal office. A recent decision by the Court of Appeals addressing that circumstance provides the opportunity for authors Thomas Moore and Matthew Gaier to examine the venue rules as they apply in malpractice actions.
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
15 minute read
October 04, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Patients' Right to Their Own EMR MetadataMedical records that used to be recorded primarily on paper, in the form of either handwritten or typed notations, are now entered on computers and stored electronically on computers or file servers. As Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier explore in this edition of their Medical Malpractice column, this new medical record medium has effected a sea change on medical malpractice litigation in several respects.
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
17 minute read
August 02, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Evidentiary Use of Learned TreatisesIn a recent column in the New York Law Journal, Professor Michael Hutter raised the question of whether New York should adopt FRE 803(18), the Federal Rule of Evidence pertaining to the admissibility at trial of statements contained in treatises, periodical or pamphlets. Hutter's position was that adoption of the rule would be "a progressive step forward." In this edition of their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas Moore and Matthew Gaier explain why they "respectfully disagree."
By Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier
15 minute read
Trending Stories