October 03, 2011 | New York Law Journal
Do Social Media Policies Violate Employees' NLRA Section 7 Rights?In their Employment Law column, Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, analyze a recent report cataloging a number of cases being prosecuted involving the OGC's application of Section 7 in various circumstances.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
11 minute read
April 05, 2010 | New York Law Journal
Employment LawJeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, write: "A study suggests that, more than 80 percent of U.S. adults who go online use social media at least once a month, and that half of those participate in social networks such as Facebook. We continue to be more surprised, however, by the other conclusion contained in the study: 'ample resources and polls suggest that companies are not addressing potential implications to their business.'"
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
12 minute read
November 30, 2005 | Law.com
Are Arbitration Agreements in Job Applications Enforceable?With increasing frequency, employers in many industries are embracing the use of arbitration as the exclusive dispute resolution mechanism with their employees. Two recent cases addressed the enforceability of arbitration agreements contained in job applications -- and came to opposite conclusions. Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, discuss those cases and their significance for employers who might be thinking of using such clauses.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
12 minute read
June 02, 2003 | New York Law Journal
Employment LawBy Jeffrey S. Klein And Nicholas J. Pappas
14 minute read
August 07, 2006 | New York Law Journal
Employment LawJeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, write that in recent years, so-called "whistleblowers" have asserted claims against their former employers with increased frequency, asserting that they were discharged from their jobs, or that they suffered some other adverse employment action, because they reported or complained about allegedly unlawful conduct by their employer.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
11 minute read
June 08, 2007 | Corporate Counsel
Commentary: Questioning Class Certification in Wal-Mart Employment Discrimination CaseIn Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the 9th Circuit affirmed a district court's certification of a nationwide employment discrimination class of approximately 1.5 million current and former female Wal-Mart employees. Attorneys Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas contend that the 9th Circuit's decision contains numerous conclusions of law that are highly questionable and that will likely be challenged both in that case and in cases pending around the country.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
9 minute read
December 05, 2005 | New York Law Journal
Employment LawJeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, analyze two recent decisions which serve as a stark reminder to employers that courts can be expected to enforce the OWBPA strictly, and often in surprising ways. Both cases demonstrate the severe consequences that may befall employers for what appear at first blush to be compliant releases, or at worst hypertechnical violations of the OWBPA.
By Jeffrey S. Klein And Nicholas J. Pappas
15 minute read
October 03, 2005 | New York Law Journal
Employment LawJeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, review relevant case law and suggest steps employers should take when planning to sell their business to maximize their chances of defeating employee claims for severance benefits, which could ensue even if the employees are immediately hired by the buyer.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
15 minute read
August 06, 2007 | New York Law Journal
Employment LawJeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, analyze releases of claims in severance agreements under the Family and Medical Leave Act, the EEOC's efforts to protect the rights of discharged employees to file charges of discrimination, and the current circuit split as to whether Department of Labor regulations prohibit both a prospective waiver of rights by a current employee as well as a retroactive release of the right to sue to remedy past FMLA violations.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
19 minute read
October 15, 2003 | Law.com
Assessment of Evidence in 'Mixed-Motive' Discrimination CasesIn the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Congress clarified the standard for causation in the context of "mixed-motive" cases, which are cases where the evidence establishes that the employer was motivated both by discriminatory and non-discriminatory motives. Although a June decision by the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a conflict in the circuits on this issue, the Court's analysis raises questions that undoubtedly will continue to challenge litigants and courts.
By Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas
14 minute read
Trending Stories