Paul Shechtman

August 23, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Paul Shechman discusses the story of birth control activist Margaret Sanger and the effects her life's work has on the law today.

By Paul Shechtman

9 minute read

May 30, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Following last month's reversal of Harvey Weinstein's sexual assault convictions, a bill is receiving consideration in the New York State Legislature that would essentially adopt Rule 413 for New York. Should it become law?

By Paul Shechtman

9 minute read

May 15, 2024 | New York Law Journal

Brenda Andrew's was convicted in Oklahoma of her estranged husband's murder in a trial in which the prosecutor dangled her throng underwear before the jury and otherwise "sex shamed" her. She has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear her case. Do the constraints of federal habeas law (AEDPA) make that unlikely?

By Paul Shechtman

8 minute read

January 26, 2024 | New York Law Journal

In November of 2023, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. Diaz, which raises a question about the admissibility of expert law enforcement testimony offered to support the prosecution's theory that the defendant knew she was transporting drugs. In his article, Yale Law Professor Paul Schechtman discusses the case and its potential implications.

By Paul Shechtman

12 minute read

December 15, 2023 | New York Law Journal

In September, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in 'Smith v. Arizona,' which requires the court to reconsider its precedents on the admissibility of forensic evidence under the Confrontation Clause. As numerous courts and commentators have observed, the court's decisions, especially its 4-1-4 decision in Williams v. Illinois, have left the law muddled. Will 'Smith' provide clarity?

By Paul Shechtman

9 minute read

September 25, 2023 | New York Law Journal

Veteran criminal defense attorney Paul Shechtman presents four hypothetical cases for application of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling affirming a holding by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that the admission of a nontestifying codefendant's confession did not infringe upon the defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment.

By Paul Shechtman

11 minute read

August 19, 2022 | New York Law Journal

Judges Rivera and Wilson were frequent dissenters: Judge Rivera dissented in 15 cases, and Judge Wilson in 17; typically they dissented together. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Garcia, Singas and Cannataro were in the majority in every case.

By Paul Shechtman

9 minute read

March 31, 2022 | New York Law Journal

Mayeux writes lucidly about how public defenders became a national ideal and the shortcomings in the implementation of that ideal.

By Paul Shechtman

6 minute read

January 12, 2022 | New York Law Journal

Judge Wilson, in dissent, argued that a limited remand for a 'Frye' hearing—a hearing that should have been held in the first instance but wasn't—was unconstitutional. As best one can tell, however, no judge­—state or federal—has previously reached that conclusion. Was he right?

By Paul Shechtman

12 minute read

October 01, 2021 | New York Law Journal

The case calls on the Supreme Court to examine the relationship between the Confrontation Clause and the open-the-door doctrine.

By Paul Shechtman

12 minute read