February 09, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Trade Secret Protection Depends on Notifying the Licensee More Than OnceIn their Privacy Matters column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown discuss the decision in 'Broker Genius v. Zalta', in which the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held that the inconspicuous language of the licensor's terms of use, coupled with its routine and frequent disclosure of the entire architecture of the user interface of the software supposedly protectable as a trade secret, precluded licensor's successful motion for injunctive relief for trade secret misappropriation.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
8 minute read
January 08, 2018 | New York Law Journal
Decision Preventing Reverse Engineering of Source Code UpheldTechnology Law columnists Richard Raysman and Peter Brown write: In October 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held, to the disappointment of several amici that submitted briefs on defendant's behalf, that at least with respect to the governing software license “reverse engineering” as defined in the relevant license was not limited to accessing and copying software, as such a narrow interpretation would render other provisions of the license superfluous.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
6 minute read
December 11, 2017 | New York Law Journal
How Can a Successor Licensee Benefit From Ambiguous Terms in an Existing License?Technology Law columnists Richard Raysman and Peter Brown discuss a recent decision which held that the ambiguous term of a license meant that the licensee could not prevent the licensor from negotiating and executing a term sheet with a successor licensee, during the final year of the license.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
8 minute read
November 13, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Lost Profits Award for Breach of a License Agreement Cannot Rely on Comparison Between Recent Entrant and Market BehemothIn their Technology Law column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown discuss recent opinions that illustrate the difficulties in obtaining a lost profits award when premised on conjectural comparisons between the prevailing party and an established, if not leading presence in the relevant market.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
7 minute read
October 06, 2017 | New York Law Journal
When Terms of Use Put 'Reasonably Prudent User' on NoticeIn their Privacy Matters column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown discuss a recent SDNY decision premised on the reality that a "reasonable" Internet user would know that a blue highlighted hyperlink is the archetypal command to a user that the entirety of the referenced document can be viewed by clicking on the hyperlink.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
8 minute read
September 13, 2017 | New York Law Journal
In Growing Analytics Market, Verbal Agreements Can BackfireIn their Technology Law column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown write: Database analytics providers enter a nascent market without dominant legacy providers controlling vast swaths of market share and holding an iron grip over all forms of usable technology. This arguably creates a greater incentive for prospective providers to eschew contractual obligations and misappropriate confidential information as a means of immediately satisfying snowballing demand. In this environment, the possibility for circumvention of contractual obligations is heightened further when such purported obligations are memorialized merely in an oral agreement.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
15 minute read
August 24, 2017 | FC&S Insurance
Duped Into Wiring $5 Million? Cyber Insurance Could Cover ItFor businesses both large and small, cybersecurity threats continue to proliferate, to the point where being the victim of a cyberattack seems almost inevitable.…
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
7 minute read
August 07, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Duped Into Wiring $5 Million? Cyber Insurance Could Cover ItIn their Privacy Matters column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown write: Courts have begun to encounter a growing number of disputes over cyber insurance coverage, mostly relating to the scope of coverage, not to its existence. One recent example is the Southern District of New York's decision in 'Medidata Solutions v. Federal Insurance Co.'
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
7 minute read
July 10, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Strategic Partners Beware: Your 'Special Relationship' May Prolong LitigationIn their Technology Law column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown write: In some cases, strategic partnerships go wrong and invariably litigation ensues. In 'Kortright Capital Partners', litigation ensued and one claim survived a motion to dismiss in part on the rationale that a strategic partnership sufficiently creates a "special relationship" between the partners that requires a greater degree of candor and fair dealing when contemplating the prospective strategic alliance with an unrelated third party.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
15 minute read
June 12, 2017 | New York Law Journal
As 'Good Samaritans', Social Media Sites Can Defeat Terrorism ClaimsIn their Privacy Matters column, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown write: Pressure on social media sites to thwart facilitation of terrorism is likely to increase in upcoming months, given intrinsic philosophical, public relations, logistical and technological challenges. In numerous instances, social media sites succeeded in defending against legal claims of providing "material support" to terrorists, principally by invoking the CDA immunity provision.
By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
7 minute read
Trending Stories