Robert W. Clarida is a partner in the New York law firm of Reitler, Kailas & Rosenblatt LLC and the author of the treatise Copyright Law Deskbook (BNA). He is co-presenter, with Thomas Kjellberg, of “Recent Developments in Copyright,” a review of copyright decisions delivered each year at the annual meeting of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A., and is a past Trustee of the Copyright Society, a past Board member of the American Intellectual Property Law Association and former chair of the Copyright and Literary Property Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
August 15, 2017 | New York Law Journal
Of Fair Use, Rastafarian Photos, and Rule 12(b)(6)Copyright Law columnists Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein write: Appropriation artist Richard Prince is back in court this summer for alleged copyright infringement, and the initial proceedings do not augur well for his current efforts to defend his "recontextualizing" of another's photograph as a fair use.
By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
18 minute read
June 23, 2017 | New York Law Journal
When It Comes to Infringement, 'A Joke's a Very Serious Thing'In their Copyright Law column, Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida discuss the recent decision in 'Kaseberg v. Conaco', wherein plaintiff claimed that five jokes he wrote and published on his blog or Twitter feed were infringed by jokes told by Conan O'Brien. In denying defendants' motion for summary judgment on three of the five jokes at issue, the judge considered arguments on copying versus independent creation, protected expression, and scope of protection. Serious issues indeed!
By Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
17 minute read
April 18, 2017 | New York Law Journal
SCOTUS Holds Designs on Cheerleading Uniforms Are CopyrightableCopyright Law columnists Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein write: Some eminent U.S. Supreme Court watchers have speculated that the court's temporary 4-4 ideological stalemate in 2016 led it to avoid cases involving hot-button issues. One case that arguably lends credence to this theory is 'Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands', which raised no contentious political issues, to put it mildly, but did give the court an opportunity to standardize an uncommonly chaotic body of case law surrounding the application of copyright law's "conceptual separability doctrine" to useful articles, including garments.
By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
17 minute read
February 14, 2017 | New York Law Journal
N.Y. Court of Appeals Determines Common Law Rights in Sound RecordingsCopyright Law columnists Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida write: The treasure trove of pre-1972 hits has spawned a multitude of civil actions, appeals to the Second, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits, certifications to the highest courts of New York and Florida, and a complex class action settlement agreement with multiple contingencies depending primarily on whether the pending actions ultimately recognize a public performance right.
By Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
17 minute read
December 22, 2016 | New York Law Journal
'We Shall Overcome'—Is It Free at Last?In their Copyright Law column, Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein examine litigation related to copyright in the song "We Shall Overcome." In a putative class-action suit against the copyright holder, plaintiffs claimed that the copyright was invalid because of defects in the registration for the song, fraudulent procurement of the registration, and publication of the song without proper copyright notice. Plaintiffs also asserted four claims under New York state law.
By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
16 minute read
October 21, 2016 | New York Law Journal
'Live Nation': Statutory Damages as Option for RecoveryCopyright Law columnists Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida examine the law of statutory damages, in light of the Ninth Circuit's decision in 'Friedman v. Live Nation Merchandise', which considered, inter alia, two issues greatly affecting the amount of statutory damages: willfulness, and the number of separate awards available for downstream infringements.
By Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
23 minute read
August 16, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Supreme Court Revisits Attorney Fee StandardsIn their Copyright Law column, Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein discuss 'Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons,' a case that has earned a previously unprecedented second trip to the Supreme Court for review of the standards for awarding attorney fees to prevailing parties in copyright cases.
By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
19 minute read
June 15, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Circuit Split Creates Uncertainty in Sampling of Sound RecordingsIn their Copyright Law column, Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida write that on June 2, the Ninth Circuit held that a 0.23 second sample from a sound recording of three horns simultaneously playing the notes of a chord did not meet the de minimis standard for copyright infringement, rejecting the reasoning of the Sixth Circuit in a 2005 decision that any sampling, no matter how brief, was infringing.
By Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
11 minute read
April 20, 2016 | New York Law Journal
A Sobering Reminder: Registration Still MattersIn their Copyright Law column, Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein write: Although copyright registration is sometimes viewed as a mere formality, inaccurate statements made in registration applications may come back to haunt the plaintiff, as a recent decision showed.
By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
15 minute read
February 23, 2016 | New York Law Journal
Internet Task Force Examines Copyright in the Digital AgeRobert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein discuss a a much-anticipated policy statement from the Commerce Department, "White Paper on Remixes, First Sale and Statutory Damages: Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy."
By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
10 minute read
Trending Stories