January 05, 2021 | New York Law Journal
Creative Use of Dissenting OpinionsIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. discuss notable dissents from important cases, writing that although a dissent has no precedential effect, if creatively used it can lessen the impact of an adverse authority and enhance a party's chances of success.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
6 minute read
November 03, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Stare Decisis in Federal and State CourtsIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. provide a refresher on stare decisis principles as described in various cases and sources.
By Thomas R. Newman Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
8 minute read
September 01, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Overlapping Resolved and Unresolved Claims Bar Rule 54(b) AppealIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. discuss the issue of appellate jurisdiction is always open for consideration by a reviewing court, even if no party has raised it.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
8 minute read
June 30, 2020 | New York Law Journal
The Principle of Party PresentationIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. discuss the Sineneng-Smith case, where the U.S. Supreme Court rebuked the Ninth Circuit for unilaterally injecting an entirely new substantive issue into a case that had already been briefed, argued and submitted for decision.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
9 minute read
May 05, 2020 | New York Law Journal
U.S. Supreme Court Debates Stare Decisis PrinciplesIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas Newman and Steven Ahmuty discuss 'Apodaca v. Oregon,' and its companion case, 'Johnson v. Louisiana,' where a plurality of the U.S. Supreme Court held that although the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury requires a unanimous jury verdict in federal criminal trials, it does not require a unanimous verdict in state criminal trials.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
10 minute read
March 03, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Jurisdictional Considerations in the Appellate DivisionIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. discuss the three basic jurisdictional considerations in the Appellate Division: aggrievement, appealability and reviewability. Judging by the volume of decisions addressing these threshold jurisdictional requirements, practitioners often overlook them before embarking upon the time and expense of an appeal.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
10 minute read
January 13, 2020 | New York Law Journal
Reply Briefs: Having an Effective Last WordWhile reply briefs are optional, few lawyers can resist the temptation of having the last word when the opportunity presents itself. In their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. describe the qualities of an effective reply. Briefs that do little to advance the appellant's cause and should be avoided.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
9 minute read
September 03, 2019 | New York Law Journal
The Evolution of New York Appellate PracticeAs Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. reach the 30th anniversary of their joint authorship of the Appellate Practice column (as well as Thomas Newman's 44th year as its author), they reflect on the evolution of New York appellate practice over the past three decades, focusing on technological advancements and efforts to reduce appellate court backlogs and delays.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
11 minute read
July 02, 2019 | New York Law Journal
Jurisdictional Considerations: Aggrievement and Appealable PaperIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. examine two jurisdictional considerations: “aggrievement” (CPLR 5511) and “appealable paper” (CPLR 5512). The volume of cases addressing these threshold requirements suggests that would-be appellants often overlook them, resulting in dismissal of their appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
10 minute read
April 30, 2019 | New York Law Journal
Arbitration Awards—Manifest Disregard of LawIn their Appellate Practice column, Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr. focus on the “manifest disregard of the law” ground for challenging an arbitration award, and discuss the Second Circuit's three requirements for finding that an award was issued in manifest disregard of the law.
By Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty Jr.
9 minute read
Trending Stories