Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Tonymauro
January 03, 2005 | New York Law Journal
Academic Group Proposes Term Limit of 18 Years On U.S. Supreme CourtBy Tony Mauro
7 minute read
March 25, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer
Campaign Finance Case Appears to Divide JusticesThe U.S. Supreme Court's weakened support for the McCain-Feingold campaign law seemed to slip further Tuesday as the justices debated whether an anti-Hillary Clinton movie released during the 2008 presidential campaign should be regulated as a campaign advertisement or protected under the First Amendment.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
August 16, 2010 | Law.com
Could Proposition 8 Case Fizzle Before Reaching Supreme Court?The high-profile battle over California's Proposition 8 has been touted as the case that could force the Supreme Court to face the issue of same-sex marriage. But now that Judge Vaughn Walker has ruled that Prop 8, which banned same-sex marriage in California, is unconstitutional, the possibility is real that the case might never make it on appeal all the way to the high court. That's because the advocates of Prop 8, who are launching the appeal, may not have the necessary standing to carry it forward.
By Tony Mauro
3 minute read
September 25, 2008 | The Recorder
High Court Veteran Hits MilestoneGibson, Dunn's Theodore Olson will be making his 50th appearance before the Supreme Court on Oct. 6, something only a handful of lawyers have achieved.
By Tony Mauro
10 minute read
October 28, 2002 | National Law Journal
Once Again, Court Shows Its Capital DivideThe U.S. Supreme Court made it clear Oct. 21 that an internal debate is under way that could lead it someday -- but not now -- to re-examine the constitutionality of executing individuals who committed crimes when they were juveniles. While the Court denied a direct habeas corpus petition filed by a convicted murderer who was 17 at the time of his crime, four justices joined in a dissent from the denial.
By Tony Mauro
7 minute read
March 20, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer
Supreme Court Hears Argument In 'Bong Hits 4 Jesus' CaseDuring oral arguments yesterday, the Supreme Court's two newest justices seemed to be on opposite sides of a major free-speech case, forecasting possible sharp divisions among justices on the power of public-school officials to censor students.
By Tony Mauro ALM Supreme Court Correspondent
5 minute read
September 23, 2009 | The Recorder
Testing the WaterNew Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has jumped in the cert pool, but may decide to opt out later.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
October 21, 2005 | Law.com
Roberts Dips Toe Into Cert PoolIn one of his first major decisions about how he will operate as a justice, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has decided to join the cert pool -- the group of justices whose law clerks divvy up incoming petitions for certiorari to produce a single memo about each case. But the fact that Roberts said he's joining the pool for his first year suggests that once he gets settled in, he may take another look at a process that some criticize for giving individual clerks too much power.
By Tony Mauro
3 minute read
November 06, 2003 | Law.com
In Discovery Case, All Parties Seek ReviewIntel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. are major high-tech competitors. And they are on opposite sides in a corporate battle over the power of federal courts to grant discovery of materials sought in disputes before foreign tribunals. But in an unusual development, both adversaries -- along with the Bush administration -- now agree that the U.S. Supreme Court should resolve their dispute.
By Tony Mauro
6 minute read
April 04, 2006 | National Law Journal
High Court Refuses to Hear Padilla AppealThe Bush administration succeeded Monday in its effort to keep the case of Jose Padilla, an American-born former enemy combatant, off the Supreme Court's docket. The Court denied review in Padilla's case, as requested by the Justice Department, which argued that because Padilla is no longer in military custody, his challenge to his detention as an enemy combatant is moot. But statements from the justices indicated that his case was a close call.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
Trending Stories