Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Tonymauro
October 06, 2004 | Law.com
The Key to the CourtThe next generation of top Supreme Court advocates may be assembling at Baker Botts. In July, the 164-year-old firm announced that it had hired three Supreme Court clerks fresh out of their year at the Court -- with the possibility of a fourth and fifth clerk coming over too. In launching a Supreme Court practice, the venerable law firm also rejuvenated and energized a prestigious part of its business.
By Tony Mauro
8 minute read
June 21, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal
Ex-Clerks' Bonuses, Pay Rival Justices' SalariesThe intense annual competition to lure elite Supreme Court law clerks to top law firms is reaching record heights this year, with some firms offering jaw-dropping hiring bonuses of $150,000 or more.
By Tony Mauro
9 minute read
September 21, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer
Two Key Business Cases May Disappear From High Court CalendarClients do the strangest things - even at the U.S. Supreme Court level. Two cases set for argument this fall might be bumped from the calendar because of unusual developments beyond the control of the lawyers involved.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
March 04, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer
Justices Weigh Recusal Standards for State JudgesA majority of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared open to adopting a constitutional due process rule that would require an elected state judge to recuse in a case involving the interests of a major campaign donor.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
January 02, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer
Historic Find Behind a U.S. Supreme Court Filing CabinetFor the past year, a rare early copy of the Declaration of Independence has hung unassumingly in a side hallway at the U.S. Supreme Court.
By By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
March 25, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer
Court to Consider Limits on Speech in Judicial Elections ELECTION DAY STATE RESTRICTIONSWashington - The last time Gregory Wersal ran for a seat on the Minnesota Supreme Court, he campaigned as if his true adversary was not a sitting justice, but rather a canon of judicial ethics.
By Tony Mauro ALM Supreme Court Correspondent
8 minute read
December 09, 2009 | Law.com
High Court Justices Take Aim at 'Honest Services' LawU.S. Supreme Court justices of all stripes appeared sharply critical on Tuesday of the federal law that makes it a crime to "deprive another of honest services," leaving the often-used prosecutorial tool in serious doubt. The law has been attacked by liberals and conservatives alike as an example of "overcriminalization" and the tendency of Congress to outlaw activities that are already covered by state laws, giving federal prosecutors too much power.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
November 13, 2003 | Law.com
High Court Hears Age Discrimination ArgumentsThe Supreme Court appeared sympathetic Wednesday to the plea of corporate America and the AARP that it not interpret the Age Discrimination in Employment Act in a way that pits older workers against younger workers over 40. The case, General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. v. Cline, No. 02-1080, could have broad impact on whether companies can give older workers any kind of favored treatment such as better health benefits, relaxed hours, or even voluntary buyouts.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
May 17, 2005 | Law.com
Wineries Toast Supreme Court Ruling on Interstate SalesThe Supreme Court gave a cork-popping victory to winemakers Monday, striking down state laws that barred consumers from receiving direct shipments of wines from out-of-state wineries. The 5-4 decision caps a 20-year campaign by the wine industry to overturn states' protective laws, which the Court's majority found violate the commerce clause of the Constitution. "This is the best day for wine-lovers since the invention of the corkscrew," said Clint Bolick, who argued on behalf of the winemakers.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
May 24, 2007 | National Law Journal
New Supreme Court Rule Would Force Advocacy Groups to Reveal Membership RollsUnder a proposed rule change being considered by the Supreme Court, any group that files an amicus curiae brief in support of a party in a pending case would be required to state whether "a party is a member of the amicus curiae or made a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of the brief." The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has a deep tradition of keeping the identity of its members private, is preparing comments objecting to the change, and may be joined by other advocacy groups.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
Trending Stories