NEXT

Tony Mauro

Tony Mauro

Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Tonymauro

Connect with this author

September 12, 2008 | Legaltech News

Judges, Journalists Hold Court on New Media

No news is not good news for courts. A gathering of judges and journalists agreed that traditional news coverage of the courts is declining rapidly as print and broadcast media retool; and new media such as blogs and twitters hold as much promise as danger in picking up the slack.

By Tony Mauro

4 minute read

August 07, 2009 | The Recorder

Sotomayor Confirmed in a Historic Vote

The first Hispanic justice will begin work as early as next week after a swearing-in at the Supreme Court on Saturday.

By Tony Mauro

4 minute read

November 02, 2004 | Law.com

Rehnquist Still Absent Amid Signs of Disease's Severity

Nine days after surgery for thyroid cancer, ailing Chief Justice William Rehnquist was not on the bench when the Supreme Court convened Monday, one of several signs that his illness is more serious than first indicated. A statement from Rehnquist noted that he was undergoing radiation and chemotherapy on an outpatient basis. Justice John Paul Stevens said the chief justice "has reserved the right to participate" in cases the Court hears in his absence.

By Tony Mauro

3 minute read

October 12, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

Supreme Court Questions Power of President's Order

In a sometimes chaotic oral argument Wednesday that exceeded the usual time limits, the U.S. Supreme Court struggled to sort out a death penalty case that pits the state of Texas against its former governor, President George W. Bush, in a battle over states' rights and the scope of international treaties.

By Tony Mauro ALM Supreme Court Correspondent

5 minute read

June 28, 2005 | Law.com

Ten Commandments Cases Generate Mixed Results Before Supreme Court

A bitterly divided Supreme Court on Monday upheld one Ten Commandments display in Texas and struck down two others in Kentucky on First Amendment grounds, giving both sides in the rancorous church-state debate something to applaud and attack. The Ten Commandments rulings, even though mixed, seemed likely to increase the stakes for the fight over a new Supreme Court nominee, as the religious right has made the Court's church-state rulings a battle cry.

By Tony Mauro

7 minute read

May 10, 2010 | National Law Journal

Behind Closed Doors

No cameras, no audio and now, no main entry to the high court. Is the Court growing more insular under Roberts?

By Tony Mauro

6 minute read

June 07, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

Rehnquist Tries to Build Bridges With Congress

Chief Justice William Rehnquist was offering an olive branch to Congress when he created a committee to evaluate the federal judiciary's discipline system. But it may have come too late.

By Tony Mauro

13 minute read

September 15, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

More Heated Testimony in Roberts Hearing

John Roberts Jr. moved into the second - and possibly final - day of questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, with Democrats still complaining that the likely future chief justice remains too much of a cipher, and with GOP committee members stressing that Roberts has answered more questions than any other nominee.

By T.R. Goldman and Tony Mauro

5 minute read

May 22, 2000 | Law.com

Rulings Continue High Court's Federalism Theme

None of the Supreme Court's decisions Monday had the anti-Congress tone of last week's Morrison ruling. But the justices continued to police the boundary between federal and state -- strengthening the federal reach in one case, but limiting federal laws in two others. The justices also struck down a provision of the federal Telecommunications Act requiring cable operators to scramble sexually explicit programming.

By Tony Mauro

7 minute read

June 06, 2006 | Law.com

High Court to Hear Public School Affirmative Action Cases

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to re-enter the contentious debate over affirmative action. Three years after the Court upheld race-conscious admissions policies in higher education in the Grutter v. Bollinger decision, two new cases will test that precedent in the setting of public elementary and high schools. Adding uncertainty is Justice Samuel Alito Jr.'s replacement of Sandra Day O'Connor, who was a crucial vote in favor of affirmative action and the author of the Grutter ruling.

By Tony Mauro

4 minute read