Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Tonymauro
June 22, 2007 | Law.com
High Court Raises the Bar for Investors Alleging Securities FraudThe Supreme Court on Thursday made it easier for corporate defendants to seek and win dismissal of lawsuits filed by investors alleging stock fraud or market manipulation. By an 8-1 majority, the Court raised the threshold that plaintiffs must cross in initial pleadings to show that defendants had the intention to deceive or defraud. The ruling on a crucial threshold question in securities litigation was the second win this week for defendants seeking to limit class action litigation brought by investors.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
September 25, 2009 | Law.com
Sotomayor Recounts Getting White House Call in C-SPAN InterviewSonia Sotomayor said she waited for 12 hours to get the Memorial Day phone call from President Obama confirming his plan to appoint her to the Supreme Court. When her cell phone finally rang and the White House operator said the president was on the line, "I had my left hand over my chest to calm my beating heart, literally," she said. Sotomayor's remarkably personal comments came in excerpts from an interview she gave to C-SPAN as part of its "Supreme Court Week" documentary series, which begins airing Oct. 4.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
April 15, 2002 | National Law Journal
Court Set For Life or Death ArgumentFor the first time in years, the Supreme Court will hear a case with the potential to cause havoc in capital punishment law.
By Tony Mauro
10 minute read
June 15, 2011 | Daily Business Review
More diverse lawyers argue before Supreme Court justicesU.S. Supreme Court advocates have become more diverse over time with changing demographics and more women pursuing upper-echelon appellate practices.
By Tony Mauro
7 minute read
June 23, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal
U.S. Court Limits Self-Representation By Mentally Ill DefendantsThe U.S. Supreme Court rules that defendants found mentally competent to stand trial are not necessarily also competent to represent themselves at the trial.
By Tony Mauro
3 minute read
May 25, 2010 | New York Law Journal
Justices Reject 'Single Entity' Argument and Find NFL Subject to Antitrust ScrutinyBy Tony Mauro
4 minute read
October 03, 2006 | Law.com
Roberts Pleas for Judicial FreedomChief Justice John Roberts urged everyone, including fellow conservatives, to stop attacking unpopular judicial decisions at a D.C. meeting geared toward preserving a "fair and independent" judiciary.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
June 09, 2006 | National Law Journal
In At Least One High Court Matter, Scalia Seeks the Shades of GrayAt a recent reception in his honor, Solicitor General Paul Clement received warm words from Justice Antonin Scalia, as well as one wardrobe-related complaint. As SG, Clement wears a black vest to the Court with the customary swallow-tail morning coat -- but Scalia insisted the vest should be a pearl gray. Saying that he thought Clement had broken with tradition, Scalia added, only half-joking, "As you know, all change is presumptively wrong."
By Tony Mauro
3 minute read
March 10, 2010 | National Law Journal
Despite High Court Skepticism, Advocates Defend Privileges Clause PushA broad spectrum of scholars and advocacy groups agreed that McDonald v. City of Chicago presented the best -- and possibly the last -- chance to revive the argument that the 14th Amendment's "privileges or immunities" clause was the soundest way to apply individual rights like the Second Amendment right to bear arms to states and localities. And after the entire movement seemed to crash and burn in the space of a dramatic few minutes at the Supreme Court, there has been remarkably little regret or recrimination.
By Tony Mauro
6 minute read
April 10, 2007 | Law.com
Supreme Court Quickens Pace With Big Cases to ComeCrunch time is coming early this term at the Supreme Court. It's not just that the Court is substantially behind in issuing opinions -- only 22 so far this term, compared to 35 at this point last term. Several of its knottiest issues -- "partial-birth abortion" and the use of race in public school class assignments, to name two -- have yet to emerge. The busy April argument calendar is likely to make for frayed nerves and fractured rulings through the end of the term in June.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
Trending Stories