Tony Mauro, based in Washington, covers the U.S. Supreme Court. A lead writer for ALM's Supreme Court Brief, Tony focuses on the court's history and traditions, appellate advocacy and the SCOTUS cases that matter most to business litigators. Contact him at [email protected]. On Twitter: @Tonymauro
December 11, 2008 | National Law Journal
Top Bush Officials Unlikely to Face Personal Liability for 9/11 DetentionsOn Wednesday, an aspect of the Bush administration's war-on-terror policies drew criticism from at least some of the Supreme Court justices: the roundup of Arab-Americans and Muslims that the government said had some terrorist connection, in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. But the Court seemed unlikely to act on that skepticism and expose top government officials to personal liability for their role in ordering and administering the roundup.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
June 24, 2003 | Law.com
Court Signals No End to Racial PreferencesThe U.S. Supreme Court embraced the concept of affirmative action in university admissions Monday. Writing for the 5-4 majority in Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said the Court, in upholding the University of Michigan Law School policy, agreed that school diversity is a "compelling state interest" that can justify such use of race within certain limits. In a separate 6-3 opinion, the Court struck down Michigan's undergraduate admissions program as "not narrowly tailored."
By Tony Mauro
8 minute read
May 08, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer
Federal Judge Pay Hike May Be Running Out of SteamHope is beginning to dim that Congress will pass a pay hike for federal judges this year - despite some early legislative successes and behind-the-scenes lobbying by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.
By Tony Mauro
6 minute read
February 15, 2007 | National Law Journal
Justice Kennedy: Yes to Judicial Pay Hikes, No to Cameras at High CourtIn a rare appearance Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy made a plea for increasing judicial salaries and against allowing cameras in the Court. Congress' failure to give federal judges meaningful raises is "threatening the excellence of the judiciary," Kennedy said. As for cameras in the Court, Kennedy pointedly urged the Senate not to introduce the "insidious temptation" for justices to shape their comments and questions from the bench into sound bites.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
September 27, 2004 | Texas Lawyer
Judicial Conference Cost-Cutting Affects Federal Courts in TexasAnticipating a substantial budget shortfall in the next fiscal year, the Judicial Conference on Sept. 21 approved $225 million in cost-cutting measures, including substantial layoffs and a moratorium that will freeze plans for 42 new federal courthouses.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
December 03, 2003 | Law.com
High Court Wrestles With Church-State CaseThe U.S. Supreme Court struggled Tuesday over a key church-state case challenging a Washington state law that excludes theology majors from eligibility for state scholarships. While justices seemed troubled by the exclusion, many appeared equally concerned about striking down the law in a way that could force states to fund a broad range of religious activities.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
March 15, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer
Judicial Conference Urges an End to 'Secret' DocketsThe Judicial Conference took steps Tuesday to end secret dockets in federal courts and to eventually put audio of federal court proceedings online.
By Tony Mauro ALM Supreme Court Correspondent
4 minute read
July 14, 2010 | National Law Journal
High court privacy ruling finds way into Texas sunshine caseLast month's U.S. Supreme Court decision on the privacy of petition signers in state ballot initiatives is already being invoked in the broader context of defending state sunshine and open meeting laws.
By Tony Mauro
4 minute read
October 29, 2007 | National Law Journal
Abortion Ban Back at 4th CircuitThe 4th Circuit revisits Virginia�s "partial-birth" abortion law in light of the Supreme Court�s ruling in Carhart v. Gonzales.
By Tony Mauro
6 minute read
November 10, 2009 | Law.com
High Court Justices Greet 'Bilski' Arguments With Doubt, DisdainU.S. Supreme Court justices from across the spectrum voiced skepticism Monday about whether intangible business methods and other innovations untethered to machines deserved patent protection. The comments, some of which bordered on the derisive, came in the long-awaited argument in Bilski v. Kappos, touted by some as the most important patent case in decades. Several attorneys predicted after the argument that the Court will look for a narrow ground for decision in the case.
By Tony Mauro
5 minute read
Trending Stories