NEXT

Warren A Estis

Warren A Estis

June 03, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Fate of Acceleration Clause After Landlord Retakes the Property

In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the Court of Appeals decision in '172 Van Duzer Realty v. Globe Alumni' on the enforceability of an acceleration clause after the landlord retakes possession of the premises.

By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein

10 minute read

June 02, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Fate of Acceleration Clause After Landlord Retakes the Property

In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the Court of Appeals decision in '172 Van Duzer Realty v. Globe Alumni' on the enforceability of an acceleration clause after the landlord retakes possession of the premises.

By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein

10 minute read

May 06, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Curability of Profiteering In Rent-Regulated Apartments

In their Rent Regulation column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel state that it is no secret that some rent-regulated tenants, whether through Airbnb or some other platform, are profiteering from their apartments and discuss existing case law to help determine when such conduct is curable, or when the offending tenant can be evicted.

By Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel

8 minute read

May 05, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Curability of Profiteering In Rent-Regulated Apartments

In their Rent Regulation column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel state that it is no secret that some rent-regulated tenants, whether through Airbnb or some other platform, are profiteering from their apartments and discuss existing case law to help determine when such conduct is curable, or when the offending tenant can be evicted.

By Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel

8 minute read

April 01, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Attorney Fees Under RPL Section 234

Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the recent case 'Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor,' where the Court of Appeals held that the lease provision at issue invoked the reciprocal mandate of Real Property Law Section 234.

By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein

9 minute read

March 31, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Attorney Fees Under RPL Section 234

Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss the recent case 'Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Taylor,' where the Court of Appeals held that the lease provision at issue invoked the reciprocal mandate of Real Property Law Section 234.

By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein

9 minute read

March 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Four Year Rule: More Confusion

In their Rent Stabilization Column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel write: The Court of Appeals' Feb. 24, 2015 ruling in 'Conason v. Megan Holding' constitutes the high court's latest attempt to clarify the four-year rule, and features a spirited dissent by Judge Eugene F. Pigott.

By Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel

9 minute read

March 03, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Four Year Rule: More Confusion

In their Rent Stabilization Column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel write: The Court of Appeals' Feb. 24, 2015 ruling in 'Conason v. Megan Holding' constitutes the high court's latest attempt to clarify the four-year rule, and features a spirited dissent by Judge Eugene F. Pigott.

By Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel

9 minute read

February 04, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Court Rejects 'Colorable Claim' Standard for Attorney Fees

In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein of Rosenberg & Estis, discuss the First Department Appellate Division's ruling in "251 CPW Housing v. Pastreich," where the court rejected the Appellate Term's "colorable claim" standard as a basis for denying attorney fees.

By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein

10 minute read

February 03, 2015 | New York Law Journal

Court Rejects 'Colorable Claim' Standard for Attorney Fees

In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein of Rosenberg & Estis, discuss the First Department Appellate Division's ruling in "251 CPW Housing v. Pastreich," where the court rejected the Appellate Term's "colorable claim" standard as a basis for denying attorney fees.

By Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein

10 minute read