Filter This View

  • Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp.

    Publication Date: 2015-01-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2015-01-21
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 13–1174

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 634 ELLEN GELBOIM, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATIO

  • City of San Jose v. Office of The Commissioner of Baseball

    Publication Date: 2015-01-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2015-01-15
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Ronald M. Whyte, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Barry G. Silverman and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph W. Cotchett (argued), Philip L. Gregory (argued), Frank C. Damrell, Jr., Anne Marie Murphy, Camilo Artiga-Purcell of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, Burlingame, California, and Richard Doyle, Nora Frimann of the Office of the City Attorney, San Jose, California for Appellants.
    for defendant: John W. Keker (argued), Paula L. Blizzard, R. Adam Lauridsen, Thomas E. Gorman of Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, and Bradley I. Ruskin of Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, New York, and Scott P. Cooper, Sarah Kroll-Rosenbaum, Jennifer L. Roche, Shawn S. Ledingham, Jr. of Proskauer Rose LLP, Los Angeles, California for Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 14-15139

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 417 CITY OF SAN JOSE; CITY OF SAN JOSE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE; THE SAN JOSE DIRID

  • United States v. Hsiung

    Publication Date: 2014-07-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-07-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Susan Illston, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Virginia M. Kendall, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kristen C. Limarzi (argued), Peter K. Huston, Heather S. Tewksbury, E. Kate Patchen, Jon B. Jacobs, John J. Powers III, James J. Fredericks, and Adam D. Chandler, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America.
    for defendant: Neal Kumar Katyal (argued), Christopher T. Handman, and Elizabeth Barchas Prelogar, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellant Hui Hsiung; Michael A. Attanasio (argued) and Jon F. Cieslak, Cooley LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant, Hsuan Bin Chen; Dennis P. Riordan (argued) and Donald M. Horgan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, California, and Ted Sampsell-Jones, William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, for Defendants-Appellants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America; and John D. Cline, Law Office of John D. Cline, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellant AU Optronics Corporation America.
    Case Number: No. 12-10492 No. 12-10493 No. 12-10500 No. 12-10514

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 7760 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUI

  • Oliver v. Sd-3C LLC

    Publication Date: 2014-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-05-14
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding 2 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges, and David A. Ezra, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Amanda Bonn (argued), Susman Godfrey LLP, Los Angeles, California; Max L. Tribble Jr., Joseph S. Grinstein, Eric J. Mayer, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, Texas, for Plaintiffs-Appellants Dan Oliver, Jeannie Oliver, Joe Solo, Bernard Gross, Susan Keelin, Walter Kvasnik, Kou Srimounghanch, Humberto Gonzalez, Samuel D. Leggett, Brian Albee, Mary Louise Fowler, and Joe Shaw, on their own behalves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Rhonda Shultz.
    for defendant: Christopher B. Hockett (argued), Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Menlo Park, California, for Defendant-Appellee SD-3C, LLC; Jeffrey L. Kessler, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America; Richard S. Taffet, Bingham McCutchen LLP, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee SanDisk Corporation; and Daniel M. Wall, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellee Toshiba Corporation.
    Case Number: No. 12-16421

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 5275 DAN OLIVER; JEANNIE OLIVER; JOE SOLO; BERNARD GROSS; SUSAN KEELIN; WALTER KVASNIK; KOU SRIMOUNGHANCH; HUMBERTO GONZALEZ; SAMU

  • Samsung Electronics Company Limited v. Panasonic Corporation

    Publication Date: 2014-04-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-04-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding Before: Ronald M. Gould and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges, and David A. Ezra, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert A. Long, Jr. and Timothy C. Hester, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kathleen M. Sullivan (argued) and Kevin P.B. Johnson, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Jeffrey L. Kessler (argued), Aldo A. Badini, James F. Lerner, and Susannah P. Torpey, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, New York; Ian L Papendick, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America. Christopher B. Hockett, Neal A. Potischman, and Samantha H. Knox, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Menlo Park, California, for Defendant-Appellee SD-3C, LLC.
    Case Number: No. 12-15185

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 3752 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.p class="