New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Elliott Scheinberg | December 1, 2022
The essence of this article is who may raise such sanctioned arguments first time on appeal, the appellant, the respondent, or both? We digress from the answer to this question to examine several sanctioned categories.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky | December 1, 2022
In their International Litigation column, Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky discuss a recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that opens the door for district courts to consider, in addition to the requirements of New York's attachment statute, "extraordinary circumstances," such as the potential impact of the proposed attachment on third parties as well as public policy concerns.
Delaware Business Court Insider
By Colleen Murphy | November 30, 2022
A federal judge in New Jersey denied a motion by BJ's Wholesale and Conagra Brands that had accused the plaintiff of fraudulently joining a New Jersey resident to the case in order to defeat diversity jurisdiction and prevent removal to federal court.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Emily Saul | November 28, 2022
The allegations, in a complaint filed by a lawyer at Wigdor LLP, stem from an encounter orchestrated by Jeffrey Epstein. The complaint also included allegations that Dechert prepared a sham report on behalf of Black.
By Ellen Bardash | November 23, 2022
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster found the case doesn't have the elements required to be considered by a court of equity.
By Emily Saul | November 22, 2022
"The hardest issue is making sure people are aware they can file," attorney Jordan Rutsky said Tuesday as he prepared to file a case once the Adult Survivor's Act goes into effect on Thursday.
By Brad Kutner | November 22, 2022
"To add bite to our writ, we will retain jurisdiction and monitor EPA's progress," wrote U.S. Circuit Judge Patricia Millett of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By James M. Beck | November 17, 2022
A recent en banc Pennsylvania Superior Court decision, Gustafson v. Springfield, 282 A.3d 739, (Pa. Super. 2022), produced a sufficiently splintered set of opinions that the end result—a reversal of the trial court's order sustaining preliminary objections—was contrary to the result that would have prevailed by counting judicial noses.
National Law Journal | Profile|Q&A
By Christine Schiffner | November 17, 2022
'It's simple. Figure out what you love and do what you love. And don't worry about the money.'
By ALM Staff | November 16, 2022
The decision was selected and summarized by the Law Journal's decision editors.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Yardi is a global software company providing innovative property management solutions and services in every real estate market. We are focus...
Jaffe Glenn Law Group, P.A. is a Boutique Wage and Hour Litigation law firm. Candidates should have 2-3 years litigation experience. The ex...
McHenry & Horan, P.C. is a legacy medical malpractice defense firm with offices in Uniondale, NY. We are well respected for our expertis...