New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Elliott Scheinberg | March 31, 2022
In 'Mussbacher v. Mussmacher', the Fourth Department preserved its uniqueness amongst the Departments, albeit on unstable, contradictory reasoning without any reference to CPLR 213(2), in properly restricting enforcement of a marital agreement to six years of retroactive claims, irrespective of whether pursued by action or by motion.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Avalon Zoppo | March 30, 2022
"I remain quite skeptical of the value of this and its utility at an appellate level," said a Ninth Circuit judge and member of a judiciary rules panel considering expanding disclosure requirements for amicus briefs.
By Avalon Zoppo | March 30, 2022
"I remain quite skeptical of the value of this and its utility at an appellate level," said a Ninth Circuit judge and member of a judiciary rules panel considering expanding disclosure requirements for amicus briefs.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | March 30, 2022
Specifically, the justices agreed to address whether an expanded state Superior Court erred and went against requirements in the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law when it ruled that a man involved in a motor vehicle accident should not be entitled to $200,000 in stacked underinsured coverage over the waiver issue.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Elliott Scheinberg | March 30, 2022
The Fourth Department continues to stand alone, albeit this time on unstable and contradictory reasoning, in correctly restricting enforcement to six years where enforcement has been sought by motion.
Delaware Business Court Insider
By Charles Toutant | March 29, 2022
"Justice should mean the same thing for every American. That's why we need to make big, systemic changes to the way civil damages are determined in this country, to recognize the value of every life and to end the implementation of discriminatory calculations," said Sue Steinman of the American Association for Justice.
By Marianna Wharry | March 29, 2022
Judge Timothy Schutz concurred in part and dissented in part, contending that the error warranted an automatic reversal of the conviction because the defendant was "denied equal protection of the law."
National Law Journal | Conversation
By Christine Schiffner | March 29, 2022
The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence has reviewed testimony on a suggested amendment to Federal Evidence Rule 702: an overdue clarification amid rising mass torts, according to the defense bar; detrimental to the civil clients, according to the plaintiffs bar.
By ALM Staff | March 28, 2022
The ruling and a summary by the Law Journal's decisions editors can be found here.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Marie E. Lihotz and Marianne Espinosa | March 28, 2022
APPELLATE ANSWERS: Without question, judges notice the use of correct formatting in appellate briefs. A strong command of the rules demonstrates appellate counsel's professionalism and projects an attorney who is experienced, accurate, and organized.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...