The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Howard J. Bashman | May 13, 2019
This month's column addresses a fundamental principle of appellate practice—the difference between a precedential and a nonprecedential appellate court ruling.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Peter Vaira | May 13, 2019
Although the Pennsylvania Supreme Court does not have a general counsel, it recently created the position of counsel to the court which is similar.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | May 12, 2019
Even where a party believes that a claim embodied in a particular count of the complaint was adequately met by the defense offered as to a different count, it nonetheless is necessary to respond to the former as well.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Andrea M. Alonso and Kevin G. Faley | May 10, 2019
While the First Department has attempted to bring clarity to the issue by rendering its decision, the Second Department has yet to deliver a decision on the issue.
By Colby Hamilton | May 9, 2019
According to a complaint, the M/V Wise Honest--a North Korean shipping vessel--was part of the communist state's ongoing attempts to get around U.S. and international sanctions.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Robert J. Banas | May 9, 2019
The impact of decisions such as 'Paragon' and 'Levine' in medical malpractice cases can create a strategic advantage to those savvy defendants that may be up against less-knowledgeable plaintiffs, who sit on their obligations to file and serve an AOM while waiting for the court to hold a Ferreira conference.
By Greg Land | May 8, 2019
More than a half-dozen complaints against the Georgia sperm have been dismissed as 'wrongful birth' suits not supported by state law.
Daily Business Review | Analysis
By Amanda Bronstad | May 2, 2019
U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers in Pensacola inquired about third-party plaintiffs funding shortly after being assigned 3M earplug lawsuits.
By Amanda Bronstad | May 2, 2019
At least three federal judges in multidistrict litigation have asked plaintiffs lawyers to disclose third-party litigation funding. “The minute you have an involvement of someone else," U.S. District Judge Paul Grimm, in the Marriott data breach cases, told Law.com, "you have the benefit of funding, but with that funding, there is a question about is there to be control or not.”
By Amanda Bronstad | May 2, 2019
At least three federal judges in multidistrict litigation have asked plaintiffs lawyers to disclose third-party litigation funding. “The minute you have an involvement of someone else," U.S. District Judge Paul Grimm, in the Marriott data breach cases, told Law.com, "you have the benefit of funding, but with that funding, there is a question about is there to be control or not.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...