By Tom McParland | March 4, 2019
Miami attorney Carlos F. Gonzalez came up on the losing side of the litigation over the public role of investors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | March 1, 2019
The Appellate Division held that a juror's comment to fellow jury members—that defendant Dr. Abbas Husain, a Hindu, did not put his hand on the Bible when taking the oath—could have tainted the verdict.
Daily Report Online | Commentary
By Lindsay Forlines | March 1, 2019
"In the worst case, a corporate representative can even be lulled through clever hypotheticals into making an “admission” that a policy was breached—or worse, that a deviation of the standard of care occurred. "
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Peter H. Lederman | March 1, 2019
OP-ED: We've tried and continue to try the same things over and over in our municipal courts, and they just don't work in achieving “fair and efficient justice.” Unify the courts!
By Greg Land | February 28, 2019
The complaint filed in Fulton County State Court said a 58-year-old woman suffered a fatal pulmonary embolism shortly after she stepped off of a Greyhound bus.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | February 28, 2019
A Westmoreland County trial judge was wrong to instruct a jury on the "two schools of thought doctrine" in a trial against a doctor accused of performing unnecessary cardiac stent procedures, but the flawed instruction did not ultimately contribute to the defense verdict, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Matthew T. Mangino | February 28, 2019
Opponents of civil asset forfeiture laws recently scored a big victory before the U.S. Supreme Court.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Brian M. Block and Michael F. Bevacqua Jr. | February 28, 2019
Can an insurer cite an insured's alleged misrepresentation made during the post-denial coverage litigation, as a basis to invoke the fraud clause and bring an IFPA claim?
By Amanda Bronstad | February 26, 2019
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a plaintiff suing over “Cobra Sexual Energy” pills had missed a 14-day deadline to seek appeal of an order decertifying the class action.
By Amanda Bronstad | February 26, 2019
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a plaintiff suing over “Cobra Sexual Energy” pills had missed a 14-day deadline to seek appeal of an order decertifying the class action.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...