By Michael German | January 31, 2019
The judiciary should adopt rules that require funded parties to disclose the fact they are being funded and the identity of the litigation funder funding the dispute. The rule adopted should expressly limit further discovery beyond those points except in the extreme circumstances described.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael German | January 31, 2019
The judiciary should adopt rules that require funded parties to disclose the fact they are being funded and the identity of the litigation funder funding the dispute. The rule adopted should expressly limit further discovery beyond those points except in the extreme circumstances described.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Andrew F. Ruder | January 31, 2019
Although employers and insurance adjusters often advise injured workers that they must abide by this “90-day rule,” this mandate could not be farther from the truth. In fact, one could reasonably argue that speaking this untruth to an injured worker constitutes fraud.
Daily Business Review | Commentary
By Dan Small and Michael E. Hantman | January 31, 2019
When we prepare witnesses for direct and cross examination, we often say that testifying is just like playing the game of baseball
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | January 31, 2019
The issue centered on the absence of the Allegheny County judge during voir dire, and a lack of any firsthand observation of the jurors' demeanor during that process.
By Andrew Denney | January 30, 2019
A lawsuit against President Donald Trump filed by protesters who allege that the then-candidate's security detail roughed them up in 2015 during a campaign speech is moving forward to trial in a Bronx state court and the plaintiffs want the president to testify.
By Andrew Denney | January 30, 2019
A lawsuit against President Donald Trump filed by protesters who allege that the then-candidate's security detail roughed them up in 2015 during a campaign speech is moving forward to trial in a Bronx state court and the plaintiffs want the president to testify.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Daniel M. Richmond | January 29, 2019
Conflicting case law has created confusion regarding when SEQRA determinations that conclude the environmental review process become ripe for judicial review. It shouldn't have to be this way. SEQRA practitioners, their clients, and agencies involved in SEQRA disputes all deserve a clear rule establishing when challenges to such SEQRA determinations ripen in order to avoid unnecessary litigation and motion practice. Legislative action may be required to resolve this issue.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Robert S. Kelner and Gail S. Kelner | January 28, 2019
In their Trial Practice column, Robert S. Kelner and Gail S. Kelner discuss basic concepts with respect to tolling statutes of limitations for "insanity", how the term “insanity” has been defined by the courts, and when the toll may be applicable.”
By Diana Palacios and Samrah Mahmoud | January 28, 2019
Not following the applicable rules and filing documents incorrectly can have consequences ranging from losing credibility with your judge to blowing your deadline to file a dispositive motion because your motion was stricken or denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...