Connecticut Law Tribune | Expert Opinion
By Harry N. Mazadoorian | April 24, 2018
Finding more effective ways to address and resolve medical malpractice claims has dogged the legal and medical community for decades.
By Grant Alexander | April 24, 2018
On May 1, the California Supreme Court will hold oral arguments in the much anticipated case Troester v. Starbucks Corporation.
By Andrew Denney | April 24, 2018
New York's judicial ethics watchdog has recommended the removal of an embattled Rochester City Court judge who has faced a barrage of legal woes during her three years on the bench, including her most recent arrest for allegedly attempting to make an illegal firearms purchase.
By Andrew Denney | April 23, 2018
A Queens-based group devoted to the Falun Gong movement—which has been labeled as a cult by the Chinese government—should be defined as a religious institution for the purposes of a lawsuit against a self-styled anti-cult group that it said has allegedly assaulted its members, a federal judge found.
By Greg Land | April 23, 2018
The plaintiff was able to overcome evidence including Facebook posts of him running a muddy obstacle course last year to land a post-apportionment verdict of $417,545.
By The Legal Intelligencer | April 23, 2018
As part of The Legal's upcoming Professional Excellence supplement, which will publish on June 12, we are pleased to announce the three finalists for Attorney of the Year.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Michael D. Schottland | April 23, 2018
OP-ED: Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch has become the newest tie-breaker, with his vote and concurring opinion in "Sessions v. Dhimaya," decided on April 17.
By Greg Land | April 23, 2018
An engineer and inventor of a medical device claimed that Taylor English and firm lawyer Michael Trotter drafted a contract that allowed an investor to close down their company and steal his invention, costing him millions of dollars.
By Rhys Dipshan | April 23, 2018
The winning teams at the hackathon event focused on promoting user privacy and making the law more understandable to the everyday consumer.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Patricia C. Collins | April 23, 2018
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Encino Motorcars v. Navarro interprets a very specific exemption to the overtime rules imposed by the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq. (FLSA), but the court's language and reasoning have game-changing ramifications.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
The University of Iowa College of Law anticipates hiring lateral faculty members in the areas of Family Law and Business Law. APPLICATION ...
NY auto defense firm seeks experienced TRIAL ATTORNEY to do trials, motions, court appearances, and depositions.Salary range 115K-150K depen...
The New York State Unified Court System is one of the largest court systems in the nation with over 16,000 judges and non-judicial employees...