By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 20, 2017
Plaintiffs Denied Injunction Rearguement; No New Evidence of Likelihood of Success
By therecorder | The Recorder | September 20, 2017
C.A. 4th; G052460 The Fourth Appellate District reversed a judgment and remanded. The court held that justice would not be served by giving preclusive…
By Commentary by David B. Haber and Lauren S. Fallick | September 20, 2017
We are now dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Irma. Many attorneys and litigants lost—and some remain without—power in their homes and offices, and could be dealing with temporary and permanent loss of property, including, potentially, electronic and paper files, write David B. Haber and Lauren S. Fallick.
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 20, 2017
Deceptive Packaging Claim Failed; Package, Shelf Tag Accurately Stated Product Weight
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | September 19, 2017
Defendant Obligated to Pay Contract Where Agreement Created No Condition Precedent
By Max Mitchell | September 19, 2017
A lawyer representing class members in the NFL concussion settlement told a Philadelphia federal judge Tuesday that he would urge her to refer litigation funding and settlement management companies to criminal investigators if discovery into allegedly deceptive conduct turns up evidence of fraud.
By Amanda Bronstad | September 19, 2017
Johnson & Johnson has filed motions to toss a record $417 million talcum powder verdict based in part on the alleged misconduct of jurors in the deliberations room.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 19, 2017
Employer's motion for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial in employee's wrongful termination action based on age discrimination and FMLA retaliation was denied because there was sufficient evidence for a jury to find that employee's taking FMLA leave was causally linked to her termination. Motion denied, employee's motion granted.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 19, 2017
The plaintiff estate was entitled to relief on its motion for reconsideration where it challenged certain mathematical errors in the court's calculations that were evident on the face of the court's order but not as to claims that involved more than just a mathematical error. The court granted plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in part.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 19, 2017
PRODUCTS LIABILITY
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
Gill & Chamas, LLC seeks a Personal Injury attorney to work in their Woodbridge, NJ office. Candidate must possess the following: ...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...