By ALM Staff | March 14, 2022
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | March 13, 2022
State v. Nyema reminds us that there are issues with criminal identifications, stops and detentions resulting in criminal prosecutions that are bound up with race.
By Marcia Coyle | March 11, 2022
Conservatives are expected to target Jackson's reversal rate, but data indicates there's little to criticize.
By Cheryl Miller | March 10, 2022
"I appreciate the state bar has acknowledged the fundamental right to publish lawfully acquired information of public concern," David Foy, the First Amendment Coalition's executive director, said.
By Allison Dunn | March 10, 2022
Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeals is asking the state Supreme Court to determine whether a fundamental error occurred when a criminal defendant virtually attended a sentencing hearing and did not expressly waive his right to be physically present in the courtroom.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan | March 10, 2022
In this edition of their Eastern District Roundup, Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan report on several significant representative decisions handed down recently, including: a decision declining to suppress a gun and evidence of marijuana possession; a holding that claims relating to sexual abuse of a minor were time-barred and an extension of time for filing did not apply; and a decision granting a college's motion for judgment on the pleadings in a suit over the suspension of in-person classes.
By Marcia Coyle | March 7, 2022
The Pennsylvania case is Toth v. Chapman, while the North Carolina dispute is styled Moore v. Harper.
By Katheryn Hayes Tucker | March 7, 2022
A 2016 law made Georgia the only state in the nation that licensed lactation consultants in this way, and would have forced hundreds out of work, lawyers for the non-profit said.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Jonathan Robbin | March 7, 2022
Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust does not preclude a borrower from seeking redress in state court for violation of statute and pursuing statutory damages on an individual basis, but the decision narrows a borrower's ability to pursue class damages in federal court for failure to timely record mortgage satisfactions.
By Jonathan Robbin | March 7, 2022
Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust does not preclude a borrower from seeking redress in state court for violation of statute and pursuing statutory damages on an individual basis, but the decision narrows a borrower's ability to pursue class damages in federal court for failure to timely record mortgage satisfactions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...