New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Paul Shechtman | January 12, 2022
Judge Wilson, in dissent, argued that a limited remand for a 'Frye' hearing—a hearing that should have been held in the first instance but wasn't—was unconstitutional. As best one can tell, however, no judge—state or federal—has previously reached that conclusion. Was he right?
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Mark A. Berman | January 12, 2022
What has become of us when courts are closed but the malls are open? One hopes that a judicial epiphany with respect to the importance of this fundamental constitutional right of criminal defendants, even in the face of COVID-19, will come sooner rather than later.
By Ellen Bardash | January 11, 2022
Attorney General Kathy Jennings said the measure "threatens serious, irreparable, and unconstitutional harm." The city of Seaford's mayor said an anonymous donor had agreed to fund litigation to defend the local measure.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | January 10, 2022
Jesse Binnall, Trump's attorney, failed to come up with an example of an act a president could commit while in office that would result in him having to face a civil lawsuit.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | Avalon Zoppo | January 10, 2022
"Ratification of the ERA sends a powerful message about the nation's commitment to sex equality," said Paul Weiss lawyers.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | January 9, 2022
The First Amendment is under enough pressure without this groundless undermining of crucial First Amendment protections.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Aleeza Furman | January 7, 2022
Although the post sparked a series of events that led to disruption within the Delaware County school community, the court found that the student should not have been punished for it, as the school district failed to consider the context of the communication.
By Avalon Zoppo | January 7, 2022
The panel seemed poised to certify a question regarding enforcement of the abortion law. Judges Edith Jones and Stuart Kyle Duncan appeared to support Texas' request, while Judge Stephen Higginson opposed it.
By Shannon T. O'Connor and Christian T. Higgins | January 7, 2022
The case is significant as it not only provides the analytical framework for local governments to guide drafting and passing local ordinances in response to a crisis, but also provides private entities the pleading standard to challenge those pandemic or emergency related laws.
By Jason Grant | January 7, 2022
"Frontier Justice's rationale for its head covering policy is pretextual insofar as the policy's goal is to exclude some Muslims from Defendants' gun range," the complaint states. The plaintiff is represented in part by the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...