By Jacqueline Thomsen | July 13, 2020
New York State Bar Association President Scott M. Karson said in a statement that is it "inexcusable for a president to use his power to commute sentences to save a political crony who was convicted by a jury of his peers of lying to protect the president."
By Jane Wester | July 10, 2020
Kaplan's argument comes just one day after the high court announced its 7-2 decision in Trump v. Vance, which said prosecutors may seek financial records in a criminal investigation.
By Jacqueline Thomsen | July 9, 2020
The Supreme Court's opinions on Trump's tax records touch on a number of legal arguments permeating the president's other lawsuits, including his legal fights with the House.
By Mike Scarcella | July 9, 2020
The scope and substance of the historic rulings gave all the sides something to proclaim as victory.
By Jane Wester | July 9, 2020
Trump's attorneys will have the opportunity to bring up objections to the subpoena unrelated to absolute presidential immunity argument rejected by the Supreme Court, and the case could even go back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for another appeal.
By Angela Morris | July 9, 2020
A group of conservative Republicans has sued, alleging free speech and association violations, over the cancellation of the Texas Republican Convention in Houston.
By Jane Wester | July 8, 2020
While absentee ballots have been used by a relatively small portion of New York voters in the past, absentee ballot requests skyrocketed amid the coronavirus pandemic and are expected to represent a substantial number of ballots in November, attorneys from Selendy & Gay and the Campaign Legal Center argued in Wednesday's filing.
By Marcia Coyle | July 8, 2020
"The court is not only wrong on the facts, but its error also risks upending antidiscrimination protections for many employees of religious entities," Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in her dissent. The court ruled 7-2, led by Justice Samuel Alito Jr., to extend job bias laws for church-run schools.
By Jane Wester | July 8, 2020
First Amendment arguments set forth by Simon & Schuster and in amicus briefs have relied on a false analogy between book publishers and newspapers, argued Beverly Hills attorney Charles Harder.
By Jane Wester | July 8, 2020
First Amendment arguments set forth by Simon & Schuster and in amicus briefs have relied on a false analogy between book publishers and newspapers, Charles Harder argued.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
Company Description Hyderally & Associates, P.C. is a law firm located in Montclair, NJ that specializes in labor and employment law. T...
Experienced tax attorney to assist growing corporate practice. Candidate should have a minimum of 7 years' experience in corporate and par...
Are you someone whose talents are being underutilized? We value, recognize and support our hardworking, dedicated team members. Do you want ...