By Jason Grant | June 4, 2020
Ranging from criticism of the bar association group's interpretation of constitutional-based case law to distinguishing between how case law may be applied to children versus adults, some lawyers and law professors strongly resist the group's recommendations and arguments for mandatory vaccinations.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Cliff Rieders | June 4, 2020
A case decided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sept, 11, 2019, may have considerable impact on questions concerning the state's response to the COVID-19 crisis.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Christopher Dunn | June 3, 2020
In this edition of his Civil Rights and Civil Liberties column, Christopher Dunn discusses cases that illustrate the obvious: Balancing the fundamental constitutional interests implicated by coronavirus-based public-gathering bans is extraordinarily difficult and extraordinarily important.
By Jim Saunders | June 3, 2020
The Florida Supreme Court heard arguments in two potentially far-reaching cases about whether a bombshell decision in January should lead to reinstating death sentences for two convicted murderers.
By Alaina Lancaster | June 2, 2020
The lawsuit claims the president's order violates the free speech protections of social media companies and its users.
By Jane Wester | June 2, 2020
In the new filing, Jessica Denson, who is represented by Bowles & Johnson, Ballard Spahr and the advocacy group United to Protect Democracy, asked for a judgment declaring the NDA null, void and unenforceable.
By Tom McParland | June 1, 2020
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Monday that former officers from the White Plains Police Department were not entitled to qualified immunity on a motion to dismiss civil claims stemming from the 2011 killing of an elderly, mentally ill black man alone in his city-owned apartment.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | June 1, 2020
In Deon v. Barasch, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that while Section 1513 of the Gaming Act is important for preventing quid pro quo politics, the act's restriction on political contributions was not "closely drawn."
By P.J. D'Annunzio | June 1, 2020
Third Circuit Judge Richard Nygaard said the government "must be mindful of the fundamental speech and associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution at stake."
By Angela Morris | June 1, 2020
Three attorneys who sued the State Bar of Texas over mandatory membership and dues requirements have lost their case and now must pay the bar's costs.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
Dynamic Boutique law firm with offices in NYC, Westchester County and Dutchess County, is seeking a mid level litigation associate to work ...
Company Description Hyderally & Associates, P.C. is a law firm located in Montclair, NJ that specializes in labor and employment law. T...
Experienced tax attorney to assist growing corporate practice. Candidate should have a minimum of 7 years' experience in corporate and par...