By Cheryl Miller | March 29, 2018
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra wanted the DOJ suit moved to San Francisco, where a judge is hearing the state's challenge to a Trump administration proposal to deny law enforcement grants to cities and counties that do not cooperate with federal immigration agents.
By Colby Hamilton | March 29, 2018
U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis found that Trump's disparaging statement's during the campaign were enough to justify proceeding under an equal protection claim.
By Amanda Bronstad | March 29, 2018
Theodore Leopold and Michael Pitt, lead counsel in a consolidated class action in Michigan federal court, say Hunter Shkolnik has been swiping their clients by forcing them to sign unlawful retainer agreements with excessive fees.
By Tony Mauro | March 29, 2018
Linda Brown, at the center of the U.S. Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education, died on March 25 at the age of 75. Below are tributes and other remarks on her passing.
By ALM Staff | March 29, 2018
"In 2004, the court kind of threw up its hands about partisan gerrymandering, saying, we can't come up with a test," Coyle says on PBS NewsHour. The justices are trying again—in two cases this term.
By Jenna Greene | March 29, 2018
A team from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett led by litigation department co-chair Jonathan Youngwood has joined forces with the Southern Poverty Law Center to challenge Mississippi's lifetime voting ban.
By Scott Graham | March 28, 2018
The D.C.-based appellate court on Wednesday stopped a PTAB proceeding in which the board has declined to recognize the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe's sovereign immunity.
By Ben Hancock | March 28, 2018
In the first such decision in the Ninth Circuit, a federal magistrate judge ruled that a criminal defendant could be compelled to unlock encrypted data because prosecutors could show that he knew the passwords.
By Charles Toutant | March 28, 2018
The majority ruled in "State v. Zalcberg,"a 5-2 decision on Tuesday, that a lack of training for police about the need for and availability of telephonic warrants—in the context of a serious road accident and a changing landscape for such warrants at the time—could form an exigency that renders the warrantless blood sampling compliant with the Fourth Amendment.
By Cogan Schneier | March 28, 2018
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the attorneys general have standing to bring their lawsuit claiming the president is in violation of the Constitution's emoluments clauses.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...