New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Edward M. Spiro and Judith L. Mogul | December 20, 2017
Southern District Civil Practice Roundup columnists Edward M. Spiro and Judith L. Mogul discuss a recent decision in which the court's particularized analysis of the Fifth Amendment in the specific context presented, as well as its procedural considerations, provide useful guidance for counsel whose clients seek to invoke or limit the invocation of the privilege in civil litigation.
By Greg Land | December 20, 2017
Judges working to hammer out a new superior court rule governing how and when recording devices may be used in court got a push from all sides seeking changes in the current draft.
By David Gialanella | December 20, 2017
The community of those who've served U.S. Supreme Court clerkships, and the "feeder" judges who shepherd them along, is a world unto itself, and is one with very defined, but also very limited, ties to New Jersey.
By Michael Booth | December 19, 2017
The court said that while the defendant's actions were “unprofessional, puerile and inappropriate,” the conduct was protected by the First Amendment.
By Gina Passarella Cipriani | December 19, 2017
With an all-hands-on-deck approach that has no room for primadonnas, Jones Day's focus on client service shines through in its litigation wins, earning it our highest honor in the Litigation Department of the Year contest.
By Marcia Coyle | December 19, 2017
"This case challenges the constitutionality of North Dakota's mandatory bar association laws under the First Amendment," the petition from the Goldwater Institute says.
By Cogan Schneier | December 18, 2017
The government has already appealed the ruling, which was stayed for 24 hours.
By Cogan Schneier | December 18, 2017
Facing a sexual assault lawsuit, a former federal judge argues the state law allowing his victim to bring the case violates a state constitution.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Charles Toutant | December 15, 2017
U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone halted the so-called moral exemption rule and the religious exemption rule, which allow employers to opt out of offering no-cost contraceptive coverage based on sincerely-held religious beliefs or moral convictions.
By Cogan Schneier | December 15, 2017
Petersen, an FEC commissioner and former Wiley Rein summer associate, had trouble answering basic legal questions in his hearing this week, like defining motion in limine and Daubert standard.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...